Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6lo-backbone-router-13.txt> (IPv6 Backbone Router) to Proposed Standard

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Thu, 23 January 2020 15:59 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14AEF120113 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 07:59:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qPwC6hcjzQQJ for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 07:59:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt1-x831.google.com (mail-qt1-x831.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::831]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1697120118 for <6man@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 07:59:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt1-x831.google.com with SMTP id v25so2817637qto.7 for <6man@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 07:59:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=lBpMALTfqcFGUdPd3IQ9DerT7/bfMdGCHTqiRIzI2h8=; b=PqXLivGMvYAMPUaHkFo6LgSQbxHJpjz5SlvpyaZtdhJmcjpu4wymltdFsU01BsAXDe T7FzFjVZN8ORqQtEnWxYAf3uqwtV2LOgaDmd4J2k4TT7UNoJ/G91UtXpppDUXIpavLNH 3aKMmVoo/C8Wo9fbq93DxKWo+ZcxPdAXXvBI6HcNmMLd0fpeWgUCF4DsLiDSsbF4Oa5x vS7U0tbJa7EKsB7Gv7+sX5u9kll2H//+hZjXtdNVtWKxMYY3NXSILVmtM2coZ0nuHjNB +WsSTuCJ/t7lEWoDZbLEdQQ/jL2rKoXC8q8BEnWk8+Zf73rp5SlV1OPtJe4QyF2FJ/DC WtwA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=lBpMALTfqcFGUdPd3IQ9DerT7/bfMdGCHTqiRIzI2h8=; b=RNl7M7glNY5RVy0OY8MiOPk+wA/jWnNCj2u1YYVkP6NwGumwXFNjgvBMDWb2FELQen HQrViEG+ReRqrX3k9nuFKmdzkY9k/eug4947kzikYCuYYcq/XiPYAdcJdTLCGZ/7Nenk Y8A6QJcnoauOkL8GW9RWaW5P48T6f7Kv6pPWwKiLEkDwr1P96Xf+2UR9HOOPpft2dJNJ 8/tVcixBkoHV2Yce3fd3Pt7Eu1+i1pM6W9jfZIrFztiVIfws9iUorCE+x7etLndu6caM hzS2obXmOifJhX1GAqDvclU5zzIS6rQgNiKhJ4yoioXDEpvwAbxTSGNFwx6z7lJtEfT6 Jpeg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVx2CPzuMAc6P/6qBwQ+6W/K1v5UAw/fTdbhH9s0td4q9GDi2+Q vBGG1hiPxWVj0eejTv6HQMISag==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxKuw4/0XK2g4N6+yE0BZW1xDqwdrRxfUXXmGFI2iWIo3iCbT1ohrKMwhxuW05ZWl3598YhWw==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:2c7d:: with SMTP id e58mr16989128qta.196.1579795191014; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 07:59:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:18b:300:36ee:4921:1944:1272:63cb? ([2601:18b:300:36ee:4921:1944:1272:63cb]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n132sm1083408qke.58.2020.01.23.07.59.50 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 23 Jan 2020 07:59:50 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.4\))
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6lo-backbone-router-13.txt> (IPv6 Backbone Router) to Proposed Standard
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
In-Reply-To: <157978439833.22753.9060324109763402275.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 10:59:48 -0500
Cc: 6MAN <6man@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <FF00FDA4-E1A4-4D07-8670-3AF88DCDFDDB@fugue.com>
References: <157978439833.22753.9060324109763402275.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/YLWKLXJ8W921Vrej-YkRr0A9cRQ>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 15:59:55 -0000

On Jan 23, 2020, at 7:59 AM, The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> wrote:
> The IESG has received a request from the IPv6 over Networks of
> Resource-constrained Nodes WG (6lo) to consider the following document: -
> 'IPv6 Backbone Router'
>  <draft-ietf-6lo-backbone-router-13.txt> as Proposed Standard
> 
>   This document updates RFC 6775 and RFC 8505 in order to enable proxy
>   services for IPv6 Neighbor Discovery by Routing Registrars called
>   Backbone Routers.  Backbone Routers are placed along the wireless
>   edge of a Backbone, and federate multiple wireless links to form a
>   single MultiLink Subnet.

I’m not sure how much visibility this has had to IETF wgs that aren’t in the IoT space, but FYI, the key thing to know about this proposal is that it’s not actually a router.   It’s a weird sort of bridge, using proxy ND to make it appear as if all the devices on the IoT network are actually on the conventional (ethernet or WiFi) LAN.   I’m not taking a position on whether this is a good or a bad idea, but since it’s in last call, I wanted people who haven’t been involved thus far to just notice what’s being proposed and think about it (and possibly review the document).