IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Section 2.4 of rfc4291bis

DY Kim <dykim6@gmail.com> Sat, 05 August 2017 02:19 UTC

Return-Path: <dykim6@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E8D5126B6D for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Aug 2017 19:19:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nQjntJZTyhZk for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Aug 2017 19:19:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x229.google.com (mail-qk0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4639124B18 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Aug 2017 19:19:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x229.google.com with SMTP id z18so17923635qka.4 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 04 Aug 2017 19:19:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=3XywqYHCHVeKFMhSjtezcibipXJWy7iJHhn4v0qxpms=; b=c8/Nvk4hIlCEmvgq7WO8rNwRef2icWdhrcb7W65xgKECGFDa1CvXToWc++3AC5tOmi xFalcFodMd0JMk2XIFKx8jsgdM1IcPF8FnFUZ0GXfkH3ecIRPWx4xo7X0id9s6B+vGzy gvpvRGC1+pP0x8ud6FHaGagmuOOCbjVQuDr2DEg7rJom1iaqcNfDfeFj91tmHmN3oHk0 9Qf0KXZjspz2Fe57eLtMNL7GkjSFuEMd12q86DzQ1UEsMVethrCMa4eE7V3SkcC9xKuF zaO5L58aaMRuZIP78gJLqZvdFpEZ4UF47FdnHPhfQpfRpw9MBuhlWv5FdYYshkO20kJ+ fCEg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3XywqYHCHVeKFMhSjtezcibipXJWy7iJHhn4v0qxpms=; b=GIL9Q6k7xuFBS/LPOa65vEuEX9OQteKsX1cYTRFzN8lT3l7h/8e8k0m6sMkv/UZe0u kJmgQ4LVd4QMPYp5rlV9Xaz7i5/iZf6GP7+/eGxi4itFPlv/1DrYBVro4oDlvW/xxKg1 oJ2jahqUobgRO6gFIvItyMo+JZn2LF7OLdGenrmZJQpJ4X4qM6h9q1BiI2btMLTqZ3C/ RG1nlc6Zm9YLfvPDIrNNB+9NaO2OUKl9UCeWp2T6CRm1a2y+NAaJnFI1iPNWWDcr3rtw gAiP8O7ii4Qb5Qn812AKh5oGYzts2mDJCjYcaAjddO9RG9hjijqU4kqavUQFGlwcxTNZ jQ7g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5hx3wT2kcrhLCYZLGW9A9yy4rN2arTTOMvAtKsfhFpMGdKS1Cfp rCg1GKQ4R/SaWUbPgMVHQ2nw62oURA==
X-Received: by 10.55.46.196 with SMTP id u187mr5762616qkh.156.1501899578736; Fri, 04 Aug 2017 19:19:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAN-Dau2AeVZNGqU+-uExOC-9kNJeeiW5FzrVb_uHqU5+Z2Sf=g@mail.gmail.com> <CAO42Z2wBRZfUKDhupcakbqh41VfQ=Zr6VoM=RYC+-JqrwkEg=g@mail.gmail.com> <CAJE_bqf_i0ndc9z8qBnWuYVayfRD-0=9R8XqrOE1_M0Ha+VBBA@mail.gmail.com> <CAO42Z2wEJ8a0wDdczY2-FGP_8NeZu4yF4-xfoir4SRBrHODZ7g@mail.gmail.com> <CAN-Dau1SORU85hfBmZXSPh3tf8B4mJjn92c3GK0niaon-KVLEg@mail.gmail.com> <9faf9370-30cd-5789-7dce-eadc8d7f1a5b@gmail.com> <CAN-Dau3p4Urym2Xo2OwSd-E3kSOV5CiT0iq67b4sC_0XXgm6Sg@mail.gmail.com> <m2vam4kjwi.wl%jinmei@wide.ad.jp> <CB291E59-FF3D-4766-BAA3-6514C83CABD2@gmail.com> <CAJE_bqeRf=2Jeu6hGWuMWtNVcxgXyKmzVmUfxmLw5Tgd7Fy0GA@mail.gmail.com> <E1943BF9-74EB-4059-920D-09191B1A0231@gmail.com> <CAJE_bqdD4VKLPhx2y1GB-QqyXvMLRs76G34pWaxXFOCoZTAruw@mail.gmail.com> <24464ADB-88A8-4C44-9E6D-47B241B489A5@gmail.com> <CAJE_bqez3gwXGAQU77KH=C+wSpPc2_RCz-rBqseGBqvvTFXMXw@mail.gmail.com> <591EF1FC-BB62-4853-B120-880542E4F21F@gmail.com> <CAJE_bqcQDdVVA8Dngzhfwf47R1PDLpLhN-=3asyZ8CvytKzkwQ@mail.gmail.com> <97dc7ee4-422f-a15b-bb99-57b00a2f8f98@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <97dc7ee4-422f-a15b-bb99-57b00a2f8f98@gmail.com>
From: DY Kim <dykim6@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2017 02:19:27 +0000
Message-ID: <CAFgODJd4E0xYJHtCb1wWh4i085GX0_uxJTNJ10NpHkQN9ZYRjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Section 2.4 of rfc4291bis
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114f5f8ae106860555f83ed0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/Ye9Hq-Ah9QEn89eWXW80_UZAqxQ>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2017 02:19:41 -0000

On Sat, 5 Aug 2017 at 08:34 Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>

>
> Correct. That's why I most recently suggested:
>
> "Interface Identifiers are 64 bits long when used for Stateless
> Address Autoconfiguration (SLAAC) [RFC4862]."
>
Why do you have to mention SLAAC at all here? It will by itself generate 64
bit IIDs based on other link-layer-specific standard track documents,
without necessarily resorting to 4291bis.

4291bis just can leave any more details of IID to SLAAC and other std track
docs.

-- 
DY

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email