FW: New Version Notification for draft-rafiee-rfc3972-bis-00.txt

Hosnieh Rafiee <hosnieh.rafiee@huawei.com> Mon, 11 August 2014 10:09 UTC

Return-Path: <hosnieh.rafiee@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 869E01A03BE; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 03:09:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.869
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.869 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iI3BmUNbMfu6; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 03:09:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3B4F1A03CF; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 03:08:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BLC49296; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 10:08:58 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML513-MBB.china.huawei.com ([fe80::b810:863:a57e:3ff]) by lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.201.5.243]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 11:08:54 +0100
From: Hosnieh Rafiee <hosnieh.rafiee@huawei.com>
To: "saag@ietf.org" <saag@ietf.org>, "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>
Subject: FW: New Version Notification for draft-rafiee-rfc3972-bis-00.txt
Thread-Topic: New Version Notification for draft-rafiee-rfc3972-bis-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHPtUu1hZVwp9zHy0mEie4X4EglR5vLLOLA
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 10:08:54 +0000
Message-ID: <814D0BFB77D95844A01CA29B44CBF8A7A25B4C@lhreml513-mbb.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.221.82.100]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/YpcU6w7jyOjIUvhzuPPpdFOuCPM
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 10:09:04 -0000

Folks,

We have submitted a new draft that addresses some problems with CGA specification. 
This is the solutions to attacks explained in the following draft and also the discussion about variable length prefix and the security consideration for CGA.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rafiee-6man-cga-attack-02

We'll be glad to receive your comments.

Best,
Hosnieh

-----Original Message-----
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org] 
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 12:05 PM
To: Hosnieh Rafiee; Zhangdacheng (Dacheng); Hosnieh Rafiee; Zhangdacheng (Dacheng)
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-rafiee-rfc3972-bis-00.txt


A new version of I-D, draft-rafiee-rfc3972-bis-00.txt has been successfully submitted by Hosnieh Rafiee and posted to the IETF repository.

Name:		draft-rafiee-rfc3972-bis
Revision:	00
Title:		CGA Security Improvement
Document date:	2014-08-11
Group:		Individual Submission
Pages:		6
URL:            http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-rafiee-rfc3972-bis-00.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rafiee-rfc3972-bis/
Htmlized:       http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rafiee-rfc3972-bis-00


Abstract:
   This document addresses the security problems existing in the current
   CGA specification. It also explain the changes that is needed to take
   into consideration when the prefix length needs to be variable.





                                                                                  


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat