Re: Revised 6MAN Charter

Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> Mon, 20 August 2007 18:06 UTC

Return-path: <ipv6-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1INBdx-0001yD-8C; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 14:06:25 -0400
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1INB3q-0006LC-SZ for ipv6@ietf.org; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 13:29:06 -0400
Received: from pilot.jhuapl.edu ([128.244.198.200] helo=jhuapl.edu) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1INB3q-0006bC-Ip for ipv6@ietf.org; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 13:29:06 -0400
Received: from ([128.244.206.192]) by pilot.jhuapl.edu with ESMTP id 5502123.42679463; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 13:28:48 -0400
Message-ID: <46C9CF53.6010803@innovationslab.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 13:28:51 -0400
From: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: IPv6 WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
References: <46C4288A.1060408@innovationslab.net> <20070820105429.GB9879@login.ecs.soton.ac.uk> <46C9888E.5050705@piuha.net> <20070820130748.GH9879@login.ecs.soton.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20070820130748.GH9879@login.ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 97adf591118a232206bdb5a27b217034
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 14:06:24 -0400
Subject: Re: Revised 6MAN Charter
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group \(ipv6\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org


Tim Chown wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 03:26:54PM +0300, Jari Arkko wrote:
>>> Also, could the cahirs confirm the final status of the existing eight WG
>>> drafts as listed at:
>>> http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/ipv6-charter.html
>>>
>>> Four of these aren't mentioned in the revised charter; are they
>>> expected to complete before 6MAN forms?
>>>   
>> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/ipv6/ gives the status of the various items.
>> Basically, anything that is RFC Editor's queue need not be
>> listed any more. Some rechartering efforts have ignored
>> documents in IESG Processing stage too, because it can be
>> assumed that the documents get approved before the charter.
> 
> Thanks Jari, in which case all looks well... the RFC Editor Queue drafts
> were not mentioned, but as you say these should be approved before 6MAN
> becomes active.
> 
> RFC-Editor's Queue:
> draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-11
> draft-ietf-ipv6-over-ppp-v2-03
> draft-ietf-ipv6-privacy-addrs-v2-05
> draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2462bis-08
> 

Tim,
      Yes, I intentionally left documents in the RFC Editor's Queue out 
of the 6MAN charter.

Regards,
Brian

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------