Re: Spring Appeal and [Errata Rejected] RFC8200 (6003)

Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl> Fri, 15 May 2020 22:59 UTC

Return-Path: <sander@steffann.nl>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E01AF3A0AD7 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 May 2020 15:59:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=steffann.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PmweIxON5R6I for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 May 2020 15:59:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.sintact.nl (mail.sintact.nl [83.247.10.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B48E3A09FB for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 May 2020 15:59:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F7C949; Sat, 16 May 2020 00:59:14 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=steffann.nl; h= x-mailer:references:in-reply-to:date:date:subject:subject :mime-version:content-type:content-type:message-id:from:from :received:received; s=mail; t=1589583552; bh=veER8WEZyHCMcw7dj3t WDphncH980/rjN3GSOwE7xYM=; b=DrC6y03Hah/MdGbpIyYGi6Jf0EgPwlA6+QD 4aOyRkepgW9enedrdfoD2NFG4p2OqEi93Cdvnnzcy5u5GeS+STnrh0Tuc67yKUje UvgSEC9K3p84aRQrWDG2mSM99mKMRDQOW5zZbX76yFgoQPq1nL2YJ0/CjD6JO7bY cGD1iQ4w=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.sintact.nl
Received: from mail.sintact.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.sintact.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id NocwfZedWZwi; Sat, 16 May 2020 00:59:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [IPv6:2a02:a213:a300:ce80:9e3:2a70:3627:5486] (unknown [IPv6:2a02:a213:a300:ce80:9e3:2a70:3627:5486]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4E4C13C; Sat, 16 May 2020 00:59:12 +0200 (CEST)
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
From: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
Message-Id: <D1E37241-D20B-47C3-B5C1-B04B63F71F85@steffann.nl>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_87998F62-B35B-4ECC-BD0E-E049EF7CC516"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
Subject: Re: Spring Appeal and [Errata Rejected] RFC8200 (6003)
Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 00:59:10 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAOj+MMEj2XGOu-vZ7jQmQyuL4DRhEzz1yd9aHDjeTaiNWTM3Og@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
References: <20200510184112.9643EF406D6@rfc-editor.org> <030874d9-28f5-48da-befb-f0a210c51347@si6networks.com> <A1A84435-E0A3-403C-A1CF-CC83F75BCC0B@employees.org> <ffea7f98-b5a8-7afd-727b-eba50087aa32@si6networks.com> <CAMGpriXR55WawsnEnUYfdNUkvmTS34e4QjfSpDoNFZk-=Qabpw@mail.gmail.com> <58642567-BDF2-4243-B2DF-E5F12E38FF89@steffann.nl> <CAOj+MMEj2XGOu-vZ7jQmQyuL4DRhEzz1yd9aHDjeTaiNWTM3Og@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/bHxxWD7bf1z9O9o9urSel1UcF1I>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 22:59:20 -0000

Hi Robert,

> > It mentions _the_ node identified in the DA, singular.
> 
> Lol ...
> 
> How can DA contain more then one destination node address (other then multicast) in the view of RFC8200 ?
> 
> Unbelievable what is happening on this WG list.

I would appreciate it if you would be a bit less derogatory in your replies to other working group members.
Sander