RFC8064 implemented in linux ?

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Fri, 28 June 2019 11:49 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B44C120137 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 04:49:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.732
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.732 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ar7Ckafu-pmq for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 04:49:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4821D1200BA for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 04:49:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by sainfoin-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id x5SBnTEI034039 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 13:49:29 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 521D8202C0D for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 13:49:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.12]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45F30202C0B for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 13:49:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.8.35.150] (is154594.intra.cea.fr [10.8.35.150]) by muguet1-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id x5SBnTie020809 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 13:49:29 +0200
To: IPv6 <ipv6@ietf.org>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Subject: RFC8064 implemented in linux ?
Message-ID: <69fb7b6e-cb0b-34a8-9a36-006878787282@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 13:49:29 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------3A1AABE78B2FFC588BD3C34F"
Content-Language: fr
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/bbUtqFSi6PWJZhKHL0MGVQVaUKg>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 11:49:33 -0000

Is RFC8064 implemented in linux, with kernels 4.x, on openwrt? (in 
addition to BSD).

I am asking because the IPWAVE WG IPv6-over-OCB document is not 
implemented in BSD. IPv6-over-OCB is implemented extensively on linux.

The IPv6-over-OCB document suggests a 'transition time' to migrate from 
current embedded platforms that do LL addresses formed from hardwired 
MAC addresses (linux kernel 4.x openwrt) to future software where the LL 
addresses are formed from more random IID (RFC8064).

The Transport Area review of this document demands a value for this 
'transition time'.  My speculation, without knowing the current 
implementation status of RFC8064 on openwrt with kernels 4.x, is that 
the value of 'transition time' nears 5 years.

Alex