IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gont-6man-flowlabel-security-00]

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Tue, 17 August 2010 22:01 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDC303A66B4 for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:01:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.732
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.732 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.133, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TQAXD8lVBl-Y for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:01:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ey0-f172.google.com (mail-ey0-f172.google.com [209.85.215.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5E603A67F3 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:01:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by eyd10 with SMTP id 10so429651eyd.31 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:02:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+GQtCMkKvR07wbG4e7jPs45nXO3j3wAOVnPu8Y+aKzM=; b=asZfc57Da4rJvI2SjXmKNgvj+J2Oq3pahkarKVdvkFbUoHeIdshFYU1BPbekgNZw73 oVIwAwDpEeSp2nxTH3PflXyOJanEQPftFJ0Bs4g1BEpdk7p78thPta5VuOal9EZ6fLS4 6x1B8xIJb8tidGOlNyCU3vFXVImiNOSfWhAB4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=mjwcIW0jJ63mMK9gywyEr3OeCOM8nT0/fgpBIWNVHpFC4bLcT66MVkv6UipZr8dGfi l70LuVkrc2eHrobkD8BSaLTgL3f+njJ5wdZUwqBtNvrfnZXL/79keTFRMWxAmZv2ZM5G BrMpKnL863Qqp/B5jQg35roUU/5hSUF03o2+0=
Received: by 10.216.23.78 with SMTP id u56mr1266760weu.56.1282082525658; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:02:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [130.216.38.124] (stf-brian.sfac.auckland.ac.nz [130.216.38.124]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w29sm4444847weq.18.2010.08.17.15.02.02 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:02:04 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4C6B06D6.5050506@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:01:58 +1200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Steven Blake <slblake@petri-meat.com>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gont-6man-flowlabel-security-00]
References: <4C649599.2000404@gont.com.ar> <F7EB0A7C707E39409A73CD0353242551A8BF8239C9@PLSWM01C.ad.sprint.com> <49bcbf266a11adba2b3456ad4e46d024@petri-meat.com>
In-Reply-To: <49bcbf266a11adba2b3456ad4e46d024@petri-meat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org, "George, Wes E [NTK]" <Wesley.E.George@sprint.com>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 22:01:32 -0000

On 2010-08-18 02:39, Steven Blake wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 09:06:23 -0500, "George, Wes E [NTK]"
> <Wesley.E.George@sprint.com> wrote:
> 
>> draft-blake-ipv6-flow-label-nonce-02 is expired and I haven't heard much
>> effort to push it forward again. IMO it would be more helpful to
> consider
>> security implications and evaluate your solution with
>> draft-carpenter-6man-flow-update-03,
>> draft-donley-6man-flowlabel-transport-sig-00, etc in mind. I believe
> that
>> it should integrate well, but I'd rather see a draft revision that takes
>> this explicitly into consideration.
> 
> I won't be revising my draft until some consensus emerges on the use of
> the flow label.

Fair enough. As for draft-carpenter-6man-flow-update, the authors are still
mulling over what to do next. As noted in my immediatly previous message,
my personal inclination is towards the most simple approach possible.

I find draft-gont-6man-flowlabel-security very helpful to be going on with.

    Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email