I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-nd-extension-headers-05.txt
internet-drafts@ietf.org Sun, 02 June 2013 23:37 UTC
Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85EEA21F85B2; Sun, 2 Jun 2013 16:37:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.129
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.129 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.471, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r4G-7koXv1T9; Sun, 2 Jun 2013 16:37:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CE3521F925A; Sun, 2 Jun 2013 16:37:47 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-nd-extension-headers-05.txt
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.50
Message-ID: <20130602233747.18094.74151.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2013 16:37:47 -0700
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2013 23:37:50 -0000
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the IPv6 Maintenance Working Group of the IETF. Title : Security Implications of IPv6 Fragmentation with IPv6 Neighbor Discovery Author(s) : Fernando Gont Filename : draft-ietf-6man-nd-extension-headers-05.txt Pages : 16 Date : 2013-06-02 Abstract: This document analyzes the security implications of employing IPv6 fragmentation with Neighbor Discovery (ND) messages. It updates RFC 4861 such that use of the IPv6 Fragmentation Header is forbidden in all Neighbor Discovery messages, thus allowing for simple and effective counter-measures for Neighbor Discovery attacks. Finally, it discusses the security implications of using IPv6 fragmentation with SEcure Neighbor Discovery (SEND), and formally updates RFC 3971 to provide advice regarding how the aforementioned security implications can be prevented. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-nd-extension-headers There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-nd-extension-headers-05 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-6man-nd-extension-headers-05 Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-nd-extension-headers-… internet-drafts