Re: draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-06.txt and affect on RFC3542
JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 <jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp> Mon, 04 April 2005 02:54 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA18895 for <ipv6-web-archive@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 22:54:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DIHrZ-0001lR-M9 for ipv6-web-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 23:02:53 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DIHh7-0003PH-Db; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 22:52:05 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DIHh6-0003OF-45 for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 22:52:04 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA18778 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 22:52:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from shuttle.wide.toshiba.co.jp ([202.249.10.124]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DIHox-0001WR-8f for ipv6@ietf.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 23:00:11 -0400
Received: from ocean.jinmei.org (unknown [3ffe:501:100f:1048:adf7:96f6:f7ff:6d5d]) by shuttle.wide.toshiba.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDC2A15210; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 11:52:03 +0900 (JST)
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 11:52:43 +0900
Message-ID: <y7vfyy7i77o.wl@ocean.jinmei.org>
From: JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 <jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp>
To: Kristine Adamson <adamson@us.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <OF8DDF5407.BE291018-ON87256FD6.0048182D-85256FD6.0048A2C7@us.ibm.com>
References: <y7vr7hvjjnj.wl@ocean.jinmei.org> <OF8DDF5407.BE291018-ON87256FD6.0048182D-85256FD6.0048A2C7@us.ibm.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.10.1 (Watching The Wheels) Emacs/21.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
Organization: Research & Development Center, Toshiba Corp., Kawasaki, Japan.
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.5 - "Awara-Onsen")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 93238566e09e6e262849b4f805833007
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-06.txt and affect on RFC3542
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group \(ipv6\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: ea4ac80f790299f943f0a53be7e1a21a
>>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 06:13:22 -0700, >>>>> Kristine Adamson <adamson@us.ibm.com> said: > Thanks for the responses. But if RFC3542 is not updated, won't this > adversely affect the portability of applications that references these new > codes? Yes, it will. However, the point is whether the portability issue is serious enough to require a revision of RFC3542. Different people may have different opinions on this, and I personally don't think it's big enough. As someone else in this thread pointed out, this type of issue can always happen when the IETF standardizes any new ICMP types/codes, extension header identifier (the number of the "next header" field"), whatever. Clearly, we cannot update the API specification every time we see this type of event, so we need to make a consensus on how serious the related portability issue is. If others agree on the severity, I won't oppose to the conclusion. JINMEI, Tatuya Communication Platform Lab. Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp. jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
- draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-06.txt and affect on RF… Kristine Adamson
- RE: draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-06.txt and affect o… Mukesh.K.Gupta
- Re: draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-06.txt and affect o… JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-06.txt and affect o… Kristine Adamson
- Re: draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-06.txt and affect o… JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-06.txt and affect o… Thomas Narten
- Re: draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-06.txt and affect o… Tom Petch
- Re: draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-06.txt and affect o… Pekka Savola
- Re: draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-06.txt and affect o… Kristine Adamson
- Re: draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-06.txt and affect o… JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Original intent of M/O bits [was Re: IPv6 WG Last… Thomas Narten
- Re: Original intent of M/O bits JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: [dhcwg] Re: Original intent of M/O bits Ralph Droms
- Re: [dhcwg] Re: Original intent of M/O bits JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉