Re: Are IPv6 auto-configured addresses transient?
Antonio Querubin <tony@lava.net> Wed, 07 October 2009 16:58 UTC
Return-Path: <tony@lava.net>
X-Original-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAABF28C29C for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 09:58:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.414
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.414 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.186, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CLxTFKEtms8O for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 09:58:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outgoing01.lava.net (cake.lava.net [IPv6:2001:1888:0:1:230:48ff:fe5b:3b50]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE5E128C29A for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 09:58:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [2001:1888::a:214:51ff:fe29:1e4e] (unknown [IPv6:2001:1888:0:a:214:51ff:fe29:1e4e]) by outgoing01.lava.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D45AD0085; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 07:00:14 -1000 (HST)
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 07:00:13 -1000
From: Antonio Querubin <tony@lava.net>
To: Vijayrajan ranganathan <vijayrn@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Are IPv6 auto-configured addresses transient?
In-Reply-To: <5988ed3c0910070925iaa3b136jd500d30037946a3a@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.1.00.0910070648040.134@cust11794.lava.net>
References: <5988ed3c0910070925iaa3b136jd500d30037946a3a@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (OSX 882 2007-12-20)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 16:58:37 -0000
On Wed, 7 Oct 2009, Vijayrajan ranganathan wrote: > Is there a notion that auto-configured IPv6 addresses based on > globally unique prefixes are transient compared to manually configured > ones? It depends. SLAAC-created addresses are pretty much fixed as long as the device isn't moved to another network and it's ethernet port swapped out with another. Addresses for anonymity might be considered transient since they seem to change upon reboot. Antonio Querubin 808-545-5282 x3003 e-mail/xmpp: tony@lava.net
- Are IPv6 auto-configured addresses transient? Vijayrajan ranganathan
- Re: Are IPv6 auto-configured addresses transient? Antonio Querubin
- Re: Are IPv6 auto-configured addresses transient? Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Are IPv6 auto-configured addresses transient? Fred Baker
- Re: Are IPv6 auto-configured addresses transient? Seiichi Kawamura
- Re: Are IPv6 auto-configured addresses transient? Margaret Wasserman
- Re: Are IPv6 auto-configured addresses transient? Brian Haberman
- RE: Are IPv6 auto-configured addresses transient? Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: Are IPv6 auto-configured addresses transient? Christopher Morrow
- RE: Are IPv6 auto-configured addresses transient? Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: Are IPv6 auto-configured addresses transient? Mark Andrews
- Re: Are IPv6 auto-configured addresses transient? Brian E Carpenter
- RE: Are IPv6 auto-configured addresses transient? Hemant Singh (shemant)