Re: Are IPv6 auto-configured addresses transient?

Antonio Querubin <tony@lava.net> Wed, 07 October 2009 16:58 UTC

Return-Path: <tony@lava.net>
X-Original-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAABF28C29C for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 09:58:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.414
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.414 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.186, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CLxTFKEtms8O for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 09:58:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outgoing01.lava.net (cake.lava.net [IPv6:2001:1888:0:1:230:48ff:fe5b:3b50]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE5E128C29A for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 09:58:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [2001:1888::a:214:51ff:fe29:1e4e] (unknown [IPv6:2001:1888:0:a:214:51ff:fe29:1e4e]) by outgoing01.lava.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D45AD0085; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 07:00:14 -1000 (HST)
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 07:00:13 -1000
From: Antonio Querubin <tony@lava.net>
To: Vijayrajan ranganathan <vijayrn@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Are IPv6 auto-configured addresses transient?
In-Reply-To: <5988ed3c0910070925iaa3b136jd500d30037946a3a@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.1.00.0910070648040.134@cust11794.lava.net>
References: <5988ed3c0910070925iaa3b136jd500d30037946a3a@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (OSX 882 2007-12-20)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 16:58:37 -0000

On Wed, 7 Oct 2009, Vijayrajan ranganathan wrote:

> Is there a notion that auto-configured IPv6 addresses based on
> globally unique prefixes are transient compared to manually configured
> ones?

It depends.  SLAAC-created addresses are pretty much fixed as long as the 
device isn't moved to another network and it's ethernet port swapped out 
with another.  Addresses for anonymity might be considered transient since 
they seem to change upon reboot.


Antonio Querubin
808-545-5282 x3003
e-mail/xmpp:  tony@lava.net