IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: 6MAN WG Last Call - draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-mibs-obsolete

Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> Thu, 10 December 2015 16:44 UTC

Return-Path: <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98C341A888F for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 08:44:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C2_KIlIu6v91 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 08:44:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from web01.jbserver.net (web01.jbserver.net [IPv6:2a00:8240:6:a::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5583F1A8866 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 08:44:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [181.165.125.191] (helo=[192.168.3.107]) by web01.jbserver.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from <fgont@si6networks.com>) id 1a74K8-00028l-80; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 17:44:08 +0100
Subject: Re: 6MAN WG Last Call - draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-mibs-obsolete
To: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>, ipv6@ietf.org
References: <5C5991B4-EAF8-4BC9-8F99-90D9017ACC5C@gmail.com> <1712E70A-CC17-4622-AE64-18079FFE07D6@gmail.com> <5660BD42.6060603@si6networks.com> <56659EB4.4060107@innovationslab.net>
From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Message-ID: <5669A670.9030703@si6networks.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 13:21:04 -0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <56659EB4.4060107@innovationslab.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/fT1YrxeRS6nJTwCSSPEn5pV7H9k>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 16:44:15 -0000

Brian,

On 12/07/2015 11:59 AM, Brian Haberman wrote:
> Hi Fernando,
>      This was mentioned before... MIBs are different in that each
> variable in the MIB contains a STATUS field that needs to be updated in
> order to effectively inform network management software that it is
> obsolete. In other words, the document status has no bearing on how the
> network management software handles the MIB variables.

Ok. I can take a look at the document if that helps. Please do let me know.

Thanks,
-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status