Re: [v6ops] A proposal for draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07

james woodyatt <jhw@google.com> Tue, 07 March 2017 18:52 UTC

Return-Path: <jhw@google.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F99F12954B for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 10:52:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4A8frxydxIHS for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 10:52:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x230.google.com (mail-pg0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 973491294A4 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 10:52:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x230.google.com with SMTP id b129so3558957pgc.2 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 10:52:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=Rd974OnOm/kZU0/TkKTLb55Vafe41UaV9lJScCG8Fz4=; b=VBBY7y6mZv9eN0K7rPu5l4gzsQ3sjpJtQt0ZMas+giiEsLT2CFyp3aSsOykIrhVlVe FLUrdPESGT+hp3GKspNWA7zgKLjd4UYrln2C7gCwRiaUggsmtevmYH6qH3qhh42Yjnqf oZGuTELh21a4VWrmBcXtRMiditvbxvEwp30aCqZLSjmKe0pK3fotiJmzGaQFr6zBSZ1K s5o6ne14rOQ8y4lXoeyHCsKr+dEmMGfkFpbEVZSJ5B2L/O2hkmcgBIgfGOgxqH4OViX1 aN0e+qQKBKWf7Rw8FqW8RIk4Ny6ZLrbEqZ9COh9Max6taSiVb4IfUnr9TbDris91j8f7 2WuA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=Rd974OnOm/kZU0/TkKTLb55Vafe41UaV9lJScCG8Fz4=; b=C2msjI/qtXsy+t5OB5vEpqs94j6UQYvtHpLqeOpb3FGvDScuFpJ4pFqNfb2eb4K6O4 mV/r+5WXjxwiBwUinDyTc2qXcRzVo+isTiUQnLXMVefWCIeygBarjIkjlNHAgOeO2okk N/nIIxLF+FrRsjhM6/la1t61YY7VQT1frvLigyk9sYNWicSYbG7tzgdJ3EHt9WaYjArK 5h4bDKFd6FWyxK4Coi1jAbNrgMTz5nS0F7KL5qbeSYursfBpOQ2QilVX+F/RfyPCUkyk 6q6aSkAuS0lBtjTjPxFk2aJmCk8KUaMrqIhiVDPOFdH7wj9x7vQqa1sBM4/DRCorTF/o qHVg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39m7AI1Zmf6+WSEhnVX3D5FhjCcCcT0Z6mA4d8y208J/3PVQ7qO+ora/CowR3b0sNELE
X-Received: by 10.99.217.69 with SMTP id e5mr2125783pgj.56.1488912757894; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 10:52:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-100-99-230-134.pao.corp.google.com ([100.99.230.134]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z189sm1316702pgb.3.2017.03.07.10.52.36 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 07 Mar 2017 10:52:37 -0800 (PST)
From: james woodyatt <jhw@google.com>
Message-Id: <5DB1E200-4BCC-450C-8B5C-E8B14506EAD7@google.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_98692A50-0C82-44CE-B270-1203CE00C47B"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Subject: Re: [v6ops] A proposal for draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 10:52:35 -0800
In-Reply-To: <CAJE_bqfpE-NWwG12S4CXM+ZnHdHHH31-y+_+pYhuCuq2FtqZ4w@mail.gmail.com>
To: =?utf-8?B?56We5piO6YGU5ZOJ?= <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
References: <CAN-Dau17q_BrUuzfvB1mLDt6p5UxYikphWaHpa8VQ2L-3kx-DA@mail.gmail.com> <a484b60f9d9b4fcea24dc320c550da2c@XCH15-06-11.nw.nos.boeing.com> <ee764408573b4db4b22e58c4ea5f289c@XCH15-06-11.nw.nos.boeing.com> <2c0ab33b-abbe-caf1-6147-0c583d7f5d61@gmail.com> <CAN-Dau0bSPiubeDOFeJAg6H0wP0ZNDS514eedmJtkOqHTXWOOw@mail.gmail.com> <D6D5B476-7F21-4F49-A81D-C2A11C30ADEC@google.com> <453e5b4160514907bc1bb822770e0cac@XCH15-06-11.nw.nos.boeing.com> <ABE47051-FBFC-460F-89B0-FFD451410F7B@google.com> <m1cjviu-0000EYC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <5BC57F0E-50FD-4452-853F-A08291C91EB1@google.com> <m1ck5mu-0000GaC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <5B4AFF50-8CA9-4134-8CE2-A383DB5F8BF5@google.com> <m1ckxfo-0000IMC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <225F639E-27C1-4408-BC2B-26500929049B@google.com> <CAOSSMjUR203+hYFBrFBrj9Xkjux3o7fYNd4y9kNyxwpLxF11ew@mail.gmail.com> <6D825351-7F43-4540-89AB-48DC2B5E92E3@google.com> <CAOSSMjUP6m-L1iNhE=BxHW+7hvt4YsZgxxtVn+qmgEVS9HeStA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJE_bqfpE-NWwG12S4CXM+ZnHdHHH31-y+_+pYhuCuq2FtqZ4w@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/gYg1bLGcvUQwsrvTZCdSHwMZ2Lc>
Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 18:52:39 -0000

On Mar 6, 2017, at 17:11, 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>; wrote:
> 
> The bottom line is, if there is an implementation that ignores a PIO
> - with both L and A flag on, and
> - with prefix length being something other than 64
> - received on a link whose IID is specified to be 64 (like Ethernet)
> even for on-link determination, then that implementation violates
> RFC4861.

LwIP ignores all PIO with Prefix Length not 64, which is the prefix length on all the link types it supports, regardless of A and L flag values.


--james woodyatt <jhw@google.com <mailto:jhw@google.com>>