draft-ietf-6man-flow-ecmp-04 as standards track instead of BCP?
Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Mon, 11 July 2011 22:12 UTC
Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 943A411E82FA for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 15:12:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.676
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.676 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.077, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wxuIqH991KXP for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 15:12:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vx0-f172.google.com (mail-vx0-f172.google.com [209.85.220.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E0A111E8308 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 15:12:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vxi40 with SMTP id 40so4501138vxi.31 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 15:12:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0nvqjRlto4FsBWfa+TztZKPk61CTBz/UiZcLDRghtHs=; b=jeXMdW5rSzfoMimf6zM02susFIYHpU2Ebh9CDuobDZjPruK/8wr/fFSSJzAXl4Z+VT 1QlkkPfsJ0++qKBhKyqOqI++0mRSWBPoVVeI5lvHJuH6Kx5lwhcfT3OQim3JVIiOsw00 PLKVlHhQ0roe4OA/8z4Upm/RxhhjF8UY6/Yh4=
Received: by 10.52.187.65 with SMTP id fq1mr2729018vdc.454.1310422357993; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 15:12:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [130.216.38.124] (stf-brian.sfac.auckland.ac.nz [130.216.38.124]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k14sm142322vdu.25.2011.07.11.15.12.36 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 11 Jul 2011 15:12:37 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4E1B7552.2050808@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 10:12:34 +1200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: 6man <ipv6@ietf.org>
Subject: draft-ietf-6man-flow-ecmp-04 as standards track instead of BCP?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 22:12:39 -0000
Does anyone object to switching this draft from BCP to Standards Track? (See Pete Resnick's comments below.) It is on this Thursday's IESG agenda. Brian Carpenter -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Pete Resnick's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-flow-ecmp-04: (with DISCUSS) ... > On 2011-07-12 03:09, Pete Resnick wrote: >> Pete Resnick has entered the following ballot position for >> draft-ietf-6man-flow-ecmp-04: Discuss ... >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> DISCUSS: >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Section 3 of this document (the main section) seems like protocol to me. (For example, "Inner packets MUST be encapsulated in an outer IPv6 packet whose source and destination addresses are those of the tunnel end points (TEPs)".) Therefore, I see no reason for this not to be on the Standards Track. It seems like it has interoperability impacts and gives normative implementation guidance. >>
- Re: draft-ietf-6man-flow-ecmp-04 as standards tra… Brian Haberman
- draft-ietf-6man-flow-ecmp-04 as standards track i… Brian E Carpenter