IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: New Version Notification for draft-dykim-6man-sid6-00.txt

DaeYoung KIM <dykim6@gmail.com> Mon, 03 September 2018 23:42 UTC

Return-Path: <dykim6@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A57C8130DF2 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Sep 2018 16:42:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c4KoDzBaRvgW for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Sep 2018 16:42:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x531.google.com (mail-pg1-x531.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::531]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78141130DF6 for <6man@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Sep 2018 16:42:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x531.google.com with SMTP id 7-v6so727948pgf.2 for <6man@ietf.org>; Mon, 03 Sep 2018 16:42:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=RqIceop7dR96swPN0L6oT0IiWdlubBe3sniT2sAH2xw=; b=jd7WXHZQGv5JrnxqisCj70RxO7lKo5JA5aeL+Kk2mThTyxUQth8FWqmjiIjyIFMPw9 M9u3N8wNPClpXGDAu0IIkTQMUbCT37IMpQvaK+W8MGqFSbHdtngdigZ2ZZEqh0iPZd/h OZERHFEVnIyGtFoY/ddBDzrOGzfPyHzGRE/2iOkYu4Fn5rZMAi69emLLFiSRCvhrhPxn 4juB8InC4O6JEAS39/OHJKkw842YCDfaF/EatKHga6xD8zYd3NtdnOfCfNPkw27SuMHv zz7fpmXxYUsXP3FcwHi1FCAtVuv4EHYOOByKFJicalf/tpekRGzTsdKkIhSbikteX+g8 8F2A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=RqIceop7dR96swPN0L6oT0IiWdlubBe3sniT2sAH2xw=; b=OUaTduekK2rH6u9PJzj2/NDNb3eE3s1B9fJsqvgLPagqH6yCuLybOPde013VoPvnr9 Xu2gMzJ+3Btwzm+tCo/et9gkKzMsdArJLUEgQyFpC5bSrvmd/j6Ymvg1pLmafwRg9RZs 6JetwfranXGozS8/9su/mcHoroQBtzKSrEymkiVue+cH1dtMVTj1fKrsWn562mgxGhoL BIFzDJqCqap0brXP/eb/oX0deHAckw3ADVIIMHQ+G1qeoG7xeFFdQfrOQ5dTMH26mlT1 9ptUi/sf4rAEwnrjvmcybremW/iE+W/lpUVG3xc/mfN4bnV3ZoVZcgBjhuCtL7wBbFN2 hXGQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51DDNzyNzuzrjzD2MO7kRlV52bClnvQeXJw3wIvNmzkl7Tc7eyKe 9FMCNoNif6ujOKoAHF6NccYyUO4W
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdZpvyS2m2vjCUJYDI6DJKEHj3Y4ML4q3vRtlwRYKSK50/is5JbHXg8FmOOxwNytI+5BlM370w==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:1516:: with SMTP id v22-v6mr28219313pgl.150.1536018158654; Mon, 03 Sep 2018 16:42:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [102.160.23.101] ([39.7.53.232]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b126-v6sm29327220pga.49.2018.09.03.16.42.37 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 03 Sep 2018 16:42:37 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-dykim-6man-sid6-00.txt
From: DaeYoung KIM <dykim6@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (15G77)
In-Reply-To: <6D793393-97D0-43ED-8DDF-55DDFB0811B8@employees.org>
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2018 08:42:35 +0900
Cc: 6man <6man@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2223C0BF-C578-40A4-9C3D-3C8833564036@gmail.com>
References: <153596076430.13392.12146482689462618493.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <74D69781-F02E-4FA1-9FD4-E4597833EA8F@gmail.com> <6D793393-97D0-43ED-8DDF-55DDFB0811B8@employees.org>
To: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/i-krNsiPIoqQ64tqS89IafVsgaY>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2018 23:42:41 -0000

On 4 Sep 2018, at 05:45, Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> wrote:

> From a quick glance it looks like you have re-invented multilink subnet routing.
> Which of one flavous is described in https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ipv6-multilink-subnets-00
> That particular proposal didn’t go anywhere, for the reasons described in RFC4903.

I didn’t know of the two documents. I’ll have a look and provide more detailed opinion.

Offhand response would be...

> The basic idea was to share a /64 across multiple IPv6 links.

... in contrast to my sharing it across the whole site...? As for me, extending the idea across the whole site might have to be justified if any.

> Steve never wrote down the details, but today, we’d probably do a combination of ND with ARO and an IGP.
> Possibly with some modifications.

Would, of course, be best if we don’t have to change any existing specs to do the job.

> Detecting movement and whenever someone leaves the link is the tricky part.

Yes.

> I would certainly be interested in work in this area.

Happy to hear that.

> Cheers,
> Ole

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email