Sean Turner's No Objection on draft-ietf-6man-ug-06: (with COMMENT)
"Sean Turner" <turners@ieca.com> Fri, 13 December 2013 01:52 UTC
Return-Path: <turners@ieca.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FFF11AE078; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 17:52:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bnpcG4Pmg2W1; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 17:52:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C4191AE01F; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 17:52:26 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Sean Turner's No Objection on draft-ietf-6man-ug-06: (with COMMENT)
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.83.p1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20131213015226.32155.82460.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 17:52:26 -0800
Cc: 6man-chairs@tools.ietf.org, ipv6@ietf.org, draft-ietf-6man-ug@tools.ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 01:52:27 -0000
Sean Turner has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-6man-ug-06: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-ug/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Just trying to get a couple of reviews in early: 1) For the changes to s2.5.1 of RFC 4291 in s5, should it be: "For all unicast addresses, except those that start with the binary value 000, Interface IDs are required to be 64 bits long. If derived from an IEEE MAC-layer address, they MUST be constructed in Modified EUI-64 format." I.e., r/must/MUST?
- Re: Sean Turner's No Objection on draft-ietf-6man… Sean Turner
- Sean Turner's No Objection on draft-ietf-6man-ug-… Sean Turner
- Re: Sean Turner's No Objection on draft-ietf-6man… Brian E Carpenter