RE: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78
Miya Kohno <mkohno@juniper.net> Thu, 29 July 2010 00:27 UTC
Return-Path: <mkohno@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDC0C3A6821 for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:27:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.25
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.25 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.349, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vTgxwdnzRq7m for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:27:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og114.obsmtp.com (exprod7og114.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.215]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F0CF3A67B4 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:27:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from source ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob114.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTFDK/d62X75ZguQBUHk1ojg5hAdUGAyK@postini.com; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:27:43 PDT
Received: from emailfehk1.jnpr.net (172.27.128.44) by P-EMHUB02-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.2.254.0; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:24:49 -0700
Received: from EMAILHK2.jnpr.net ([172.27.128.49]) by emailfehk1.jnpr.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 29 Jul 2010 08:24:43 +0800
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 08:24:41 +0800
Message-ID: <C282AE46CA180649B16227A97F76C6D40D8F0642@EMAILHK2.jnpr.net>
In-Reply-To: <4C50B574.3060802@innovationslab.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78
Thread-Index: AcsuqA/APYNB2E1XSiuRTMqcQUDHAQACOz1Q
References: <AF742F21C1FCEE4DAB7F4842ABDC511C023A62FB@XMB-RCD-114.cisco.com> <20100728.181425.267352670.maz@iij.ad.jp> <AF742F21C1FCEE4DAB7F4842ABDC511C023A6303@XMB-RCD-114.cisco.com><AANLkTikY0404UcF9i-MW=sOuB7Y39cDtAg2ghkB9YHJb@mail.gmail.com> <4C50B574.3060802@innovationslab.net>
From: Miya Kohno <mkohno@juniper.net>
To: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>, ipv6@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Jul 2010 00:24:43.0264 (UTC) FILETIME=[70DBE000:01CB2EB4]
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 00:27:27 -0000
Hi Brian, 6man WG, Sorry for the delay in publishing. Comments/Suggestions would be greatly appreciated. http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p-02.txt Abstract: On inter-router point-to-point links, it is useful for security and other reasons, to use 127-bit IPv6 prefixes. Such a practice parallels the use of 31-bit prefixes in IPv4 [RFC3021]. This document outlines some of these reasons and specifies that 127-bit IPv6 prefix lengths must be supported on such links. Thanks, Miya -----Original Message----- From: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian Haberman Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 7:56 AM To: ipv6@ietf.org Subject: Re: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Hi Chris, On 7/28/10 6:49 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote: > (can we call the question in a clean/new email about adoption pls? > There was interest in the room for same.) That is what I said I would do as soon as the draft is published. Regards, Brian -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
- 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Ole Troan
- RE: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Hemant Singh (shemant)
- RE: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Dave Thaler
- Re: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Matsuzaki Yoshinobu
- Re: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Ole Troan
- RE: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Miya Kohno
- RE: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Hemant Singh (shemant)
- RE: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Miya Kohno
- Re: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Christopher Morrow
- Re: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Christopher Morrow
- Re: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Brian Haberman
- Re: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Christopher Morrow
- RE: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Miya Kohno
- RE: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Miya Kohno
- Re: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Christopher Morrow
- Re: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Brian Haberman
- RE: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Hemant Singh (shemant)
- RE: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Hemant Singh (shemant)
- RE: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- RE: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Miya Kohno
- Re: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Mark Smith
- Re: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Christopher Morrow
- Re: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Mark Smith
- RE: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Miya Kohno
- RE: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Hemant Singh (shemant)
- RE: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Miya Kohno
- Re: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Randy Bush
- Re: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 sthaug
- Re: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Ole Troan
- Re: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 sthaug
- Re: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Randy Bush
- RE: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 sthaug
- RE: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Alain Durand
- Re: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 sthaug
- Re: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Thomas Narten
- RE: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Shane Amante
- RE: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Hemant Singh (shemant)
- RE: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Hemant Singh (shemant)
- RE: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Randy Bush
- Re: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Randy Bush
- Re: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Christopher Morrow
- RE: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Hemant Singh (shemant)
- RE: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Hemant Singh (shemant)
- RE: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Hemant Singh (shemant)
- RE: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Manfredi, Albert E
- Re: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Thomas Narten
- Re: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Brian Haberman
- Re: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Thomas Narten
- Re: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Brian Haberman
- Re: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Brian E Carpenter
- Re: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Pekka Savola
- Re: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78 Mark Smith