Review request for draft-rafiee-rfc3972-bis-00.txt

Hosnieh Rafiee <hosnieh.rafiee@huawei.com> Mon, 01 September 2014 09:17 UTC

Return-Path: <hosnieh.rafiee@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84DDD1A02DD; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 02:17:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.869
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.869 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lHYrvaNRgukK; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 02:17:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2215B1A02D1; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 02:17:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BIY10707; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 09:17:00 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML513-MBB.china.huawei.com ([fe80::b810:863:a57e:3ff]) by lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 10:16:53 +0100
From: Hosnieh Rafiee <hosnieh.rafiee@huawei.com>
To: "saag@ietf.org" <saag@ietf.org>, "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>
Subject: Review request for draft-rafiee-rfc3972-bis-00.txt
Thread-Topic: Review request for draft-rafiee-rfc3972-bis-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHPxcV4+2LtLSfDSUyy8a1D1WgVnw==
Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 09:16:53 +0000
Message-ID: <814D0BFB77D95844A01CA29B44CBF8A7A2A436@lhreml513-mbb.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.221.82.100]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/kRieE81Mw8vXtvBe__DHXtTRCh8
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 09:17:03 -0000

Folks,

This is a short draft to improve CGA specification (RFC 3972). Please share your comments to know whether we missed something or we considered the solution to all attacks.


Thanks ,
Best,
Hosnieh
Htmlized:       http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rafiee-rfc3972-bis-00