IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Opinion requested: Independent submission of draft-sarikaya-6man-sadr-overview-11

Philip Homburg <pch-ipv6-ietf-3@u-1.phicoh.com> Fri, 23 September 2016 08:45 UTC

Return-Path: <pch-bF054DD66@u-1.phicoh.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A01F212D754 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 01:45:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5kA7mI6L72eZ for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 01:45:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stereo.hq.phicoh.net (stereo6-he.hq.phicoh.net [IPv6:2001:470:d16a:10:2a0:c9ff:fe9f:17a9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A03712D61C for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 01:45:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stereo.hq.phicoh.net (localhost [::ffff:127.0.0.1]) by stereo.hq.phicoh.net with esmtp (Smail #91) id m1bnM6U-0000EmC; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 10:45:06 +0200
Message-Id: <m1bnM6U-0000EmC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
To: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Opinion requested: Independent submission of draft-sarikaya-6man-sadr-overview-11
From: Philip Homburg <pch-ipv6-ietf-3@u-1.phicoh.com>
Sender: pch-bF054DD66@u-1.phicoh.com
References: <m1bmzsl-0000FtC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <E87B771635882B4BA20096B589152EF643EDABCD@eusaamb107.ericsson.se>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 23 Sep 2016 03:10:28 +0000 ." <E87B771635882B4BA20096B589152EF643EDABCD@eusaamb107.ericsson.se>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 10:45:04 +0200
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/l1tyP6f8DbkckvuPpfFUqW8CJL8>
Cc: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 08:45:10 -0000

> Thanks for your comments
> Philip. I do agree with a lot of your comments but unlike the IETF
> stream where we have the possibility to get these addressed with
> extensive text changes, there are only five responses we can provide
> to the ISE for a conflict review request as described in RFC5742

It would be nice to have a good document in this area. Pity if it would be
published as is. 

>     2. The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF
>     work done
>        in WG <X>, but this relationship does not prevent publishing.

But I guess it doesn't do any harm either.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email