RE: Flow Label support in the Node Requirements bis document

Sheng Jiang <jiangsheng@huawei.com> Thu, 03 November 2011 03:54 UTC

Return-Path: <jiangsheng@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FF7711E80A0 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 20:54:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.100, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NGJAOoVppIOF for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 20:54:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [119.145.14.64]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 600F311E8080 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 20:54:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (szxga05-in [172.24.2.49]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LU2005JCG5WIN@szxga05-in.huawei.com> for ipv6@ietf.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 11:53:56 +0800 (CST)
Received: from szxrg02-dlp.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LU200C3MG5W62@szxga05-in.huawei.com> for ipv6@ietf.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 11:53:56 +0800 (CST)
Received: from szxeml203-edg.china.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.1.9-GA) with ESMTP id AES51130; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 11:53:55 +0800
Received: from SZXEML410-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.137) by szxeml203-edg.china.huawei.com (172.24.2.55) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.270.1; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 11:53:49 +0800
Received: from SZXEML506-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.202]) by szxeml410-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.137]) with mapi id 14.01.0270.001; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 11:53:46 +0800
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 03:53:45 +0000
From: Sheng Jiang <jiangsheng@huawei.com>
Subject: RE: Flow Label support in the Node Requirements bis document
In-reply-to: <2129067463716F46AC77A22602E5CB5C01F90D3A@008-AM1MPN1-015.mgdnok.nokia.com>
X-Originating-IP: [10.108.4.60]
To: "john.loughney@nokia.com" <john.loughney@nokia.com>, "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>
Message-id: <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B9218549694@SZXEML506-MBS.china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-language: zh-CN
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Accept-Language: en-GB, zh-CN, en-US
Thread-topic: Flow Label support in the Node Requirements bis document
Thread-index: AcyZ0t2CsMUgnZ6KSxKK9aG/9V9DowACUU+A
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
References: <2129067463716F46AC77A22602E5CB5C01F90D3A@008-AM1MPN1-015.mgdnok.nokia.com>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 03:54:23 -0000

I support this action and the proposed text.

Sheng

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> john.loughney@nokia.com
> Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 10:51 AM
> To: ipv6@ietf.org
> Subject: Flow Label support in the Node Requirements bis document
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> There has been some discussions whether or not we should add support
> for the Flow Label in
> Soon to be RFC 6434 <draft-ietf-6man-node-req-bis-11.txt> As a straw
> man proposal, if we add
> Support, I would suggest the following text:
> 
> All nodes SHOULD support RFC 6437, IPv6 Flow Label Specification,
> defines the IPv6 Flow Label.  Specifically:
> 
>     "Forwarding nodes such as routers and load distributors MUST NOT
>       depend only on Flow Label values being uniformly distributed. "
> 
>     "It is therefore RECOMMENDED  that source hosts support the flow
>       label by setting the flow label field for all packets of a given
> flow to the
>       same value chosen from  an approximation to a discrete uniform
> distribution. "
> 
> I'd like to ask the wg the following:
> 
> 1) Is the above text acceptable?
> 2) Do you support adding the text? If no, please suggest text, unless
> you do not support adding
>      Flow label support at all (please say so).
> 
> John
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------