6LSA IETF Drafts

"Bound, Jim" <jim.bound@hp.com> Mon, 28 February 2005 08:43 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA19577 for <ipv6-web-archive@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 03:43:23 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1D5gVZ-0000wa-VM for ipv6-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 03:44:09 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1D5gJp-0007QQ-6s; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 03:31:57 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1D5TFr-0000gB-Ml; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 13:34:59 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA20381; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 13:34:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com ([161.114.64.105]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1D5TGP-0002wM-J9; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 13:35:35 -0500
Received: from tayexg12.americas.cpqcorp.net (tayexg12.americas.cpqcorp.net [16.103.130.127]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99237BAF2; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 13:34:46 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tayexc13.americas.cpqcorp.net ([16.103.130.26]) by tayexg12.americas.cpqcorp.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Sun, 27 Feb 2005 13:34:46 -0500
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C51CFB.03194768"
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 13:34:57 -0500
Message-ID: <9C422444DE99BC46B3AD3C6EAFC9711B087EE13D@tayexc13.americas.cpqcorp.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
Thread-Topic: 6LSA IETF Drafts
Thread-Index: AcUa47LTX00DC0a+T8eCXKZuA1LeuwACWG8AAFdABJAAAMfkMA==
From: "Bound, Jim" <jim.bound@hp.com>
To: ipv6@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Feb 2005 18:34:46.0455 (UTC) FILETIME=[031D5470:01C51CFB]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 0076290b21c69318492534f4e4dfda6a
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 03:30:31 -0500
Cc: rtgwg@ietf.org
Subject: 6LSA IETF Drafts
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group \(ipv6\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: afe851332d75a6da8a5802c142db3390

Folks,

See below draft and two attached that will be available after the IETF.
It provides a solution for IPv6 Label Switch Architecture that does not
compete with MPLS or QOS work in progress in the industry at ITU, etc.

http://ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-chakravorty-6lsa-01.txt 

If some of you would do me a favor and review and send comments to Sham
Chakravorty schakra@mitre.org, Jim.Bound@nav6tf.org, and Kevin Zhang
kzhang@mitre.org I would appreciate it.  We will have a BOF most likely
on 6LSA at the Paris meeting to see if this would be its own working
group.  We will set up industry list for technical persons to work on it
until then if we get enough responses. I am pretty sure we should do
this here in the IETF not go to the ITU.  Also we will be at the
Minneapolis IETF so if you have in person comments that is appreciate
too.

Thanks
/jim

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------