Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08
Bob Halley <Bob.Halley@nominum.com> Fri, 06 January 2017 14:42 UTC
Return-Path: <Bob.Halley@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 365421294FF for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 06:42:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6C_yB-q-bgsA for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 06:42:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com (sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com [64.89.234.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 127AA1294EB for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 06:42:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-03.win.nominum.com [64.89.235.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (verified OK)) by sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 939C67400E4; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 14:42:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from MBX-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.235.68]) by CAS-03.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.235.66]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 06:42:06 -0800
From: Bob Halley <Bob.Halley@nominum.com>
To: "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>
Subject: Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08
Thread-Topic: Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08
Thread-Index: AQHSaCsM6hSAZnz6NUub58Bqk44k7Q==
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 14:42:05 +0000
Message-ID: <CE5515D7-EF08-40C6-8B97-B1AE1D0DE167@nominum.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1f.0.170104
x-originating-ip: [64.89.232.234]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <6147CACCC89BAA44B3D62C5E795CF325@nominum.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/npYeR8lPxvmBNMcbDoiePSJ390Y>
Cc: "bob.hinden@gmail.com" <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, "suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com" <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>, "terry.manderson@icann.org" <terry.manderson@icann.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 14:42:07 -0000
I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more details on the INT Directorate, see http://www.ietf.org/iesg/directorate.html. I reviewed the draft, including a detailed comparison with RFC 2460. I found no issues with the draft, and I think it’s an excellent update to the original. /Bob
- Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08 Bob Halley