Re: Re: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6
<timbeck04@verizon.net> Wed, 23 August 2006 20:03 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GFyww-0006u5-CQ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 16:03:42 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GFywv-0006jI-0k for ipv6@ietf.org; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 16:03:41 -0400
Received: from stsc1260-eth-s1-s1p1-vip.va.neustar.com ([156.154.16.129] helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GFyAs-0000B4-SJ for ipv6@ietf.org; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:14:02 -0400
Received: from vms044pub.verizon.net ([206.46.252.44]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GFxkF-0000Tt-DX for ipv6@ietf.org; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 14:46:32 -0400
Received: from vms172.mailsrvcs.net ([192.168.1.1]) by vms044.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.02 (built Sep 9 2005)) with ESMTPA id <0J4G00DUOS51P6B0@vms044.mailsrvcs.net> for ipv6@ietf.org; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 13:46:13 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from 129.55.200.20 ([129.55.200.20]) by vms172.mailsrvcs.net (Verizon Webmail) with HTTP; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 13:46:13 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 13:46:13 -0500
From: timbeck04@verizon.net
X-Originating-IP: [129.55.200.20]
To: Ole Troan <ot@cisco.com>, Syam Madanapalli <smadanapalli@gmail.com>
Message-id: <28588455.128581156358773266.JavaMail.root@vms172.mailsrvcs.net>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--)
X-Scan-Signature: 5a9a1bd6c2d06a21d748b7d0070ddcb8
Cc: IETF IPv6 Mailing List <ipv6@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Re: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group \(ipv6\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org
>From: Ole Troan <ot@cisco.com> >Date: 2006/08/23 Wed AM 12:57:16 CDT >To: Syam Madanapalli <smadanapalli@gmail.com> >Cc: IETF IPv6 Mailing List <ipv6@ietf.org> >Subject: Re: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 >I don't understand the rationale for this work either. Hi Ole, thanks for the reply. Sorry it took me so long to get back to you. > >the first PD proposal (by Brian Haberman) was indeed based on using >ICMP as transport. separate message types instead of >piggy-backing on RS/RA though. Yes, absolutely. The Haberman draft is just one of three such docs of which I'm aware: 1.draft-haberman-ipngwg-auto-prefix-02.txt 2.draft-bykim-ipv6-hpd-01.txt 3.draft-arunt-prefix-delegation-using-icmpv6-00.txt >as we continued to develop that >mechanism we realised that we were pretty much reinventing the DHCP >protocol machine. that realisation led to specifying it as an DHCP >option instead of as a new protocol. I see what you're saying. I should say that our proposed PD mechanism is more representative of the extension of RS/RA functionality than the creation of an entirely new protocol. > >a technical comment on your proposal; how do you plan to support >shared links with multiple requesting routers? Have you had an opportunity to read our proposal in its entirety? Here is a cut from our text (section 4, page 5) which I hope will answer that question: "There may be cases where more than one DR is present on the link shared with the RN. In cases such as this, the RN will choose as its DR the PD capable router whose solicited RA it received first. Subsequent RAs received from the remaining on-link PD-capable routers will be ignored." >RAs are typically multicast. Yes and no. An unsolicited RA is typically multicast, whereas a solicited RA would be unicast. Best Regards, Tim Rom 8:28 > >/ot > >-------------------------------------------------------------------- >IETF IPv6 working group mailing list >ipv6@ietf.org >Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 >-------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: Re: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 timbeck04
- Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 Syam Madanapalli
- RE: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 Durand, Alain
- RE: RE: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 Durand, Alain
- Re: RE: RE: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 timbeck04
- Re: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 Ralph Droms
- Re: RE: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 timbeck04
- Re: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 Ole Troan
- Re: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 Syam Madanapalli
- Re: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 Eliot Lear
- Re: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 Mohacsi Janos
- Re: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 Ralph Droms
- Re: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 Ralph Droms
- Re: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 Jari Arkko
- Re: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 Jari Arkko
- Re: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 Ralph Droms
- RE: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 Rao Satyanarayana-W60007
- Re: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 Syam Madanapalli
- Re: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 James Kempf
- Re: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 Ralph Droms
- RE: Re: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 Tony Hain
- RE: Re: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 Syam Madanapalli
- Re: Re: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 timbeck04
- Re: Re: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 timbeck04
- Re: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 Ralph Droms
- RE: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 Rao Satyanarayana-W60007
- Re: Re: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 timbeck04
- Re: RE: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 timbeck04
- Re: Re: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 timbeck04
- Re: Re: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 timbeck04
- RE: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 Tony Hain
- RE: Re: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 Templin, Fred L
- Re: RE: Re: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 timbeck04
- Re: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 Alexandru Petrescu
- Prefix Delegation what for? (was: Re: Prefix Deleā¦ Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 Alexandru Petrescu
- RE: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 Rao Satyanarayana-W60007
- RE: Re: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 Rao Satyanarayana-W60007
- RE: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 Thomas Narten
- RE: Re: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 Templin, Fred L
- Re: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 Alexandru Petrescu
- RE: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 Ralph Droms (rdroms)
- Re: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 Alexandru Petrescu
- RE: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 Rao Satyanarayana-W60007
- RE: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 Ralph Droms (rdroms)
- Re: RE: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 timbeck04
- Re: RE: Re: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 timbeck04
- Re: Re: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 timbeck04
- Re: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: Re: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 timbeck04
- Re: RE: Re: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 timbeck04
- Re: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 Syam Madanapalli
- Re: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 Jari Arkko
- Re: Re: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 timbeck04
- RE: RE: Re: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 Templin, Fred L
- RE: RE: Re: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 Templin, Fred L
- RE: RE: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 Tony Hain
- Re: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 Bob Hinden
- Re: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 Ralph Droms
- RE: RE: Re: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6 Templin, Fred L