Re: Consensus call for adoption of draft-hui-6man-rpl-option anddraft-hui-6man-rpl-routing-header

Nicolas Déjean <nicolas.dejean.ietf@googlemail.com> Sat, 26 June 2010 08:14 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-ipng@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47A0C3A68A9 for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 26 Jun 2010 01:14:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.267
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.267 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.185, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SARE_SUB_ENC_UTF8=0.152]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x8H0uW+IOSVK for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 26 Jun 2010 01:14:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9FBC3A684B for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sat, 26 Jun 2010 01:14:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <ietf-ipng@m.gmane.org>) id 1OSQXX-00043s-9T for ipv6@ietf.org; Sat, 26 Jun 2010 10:15:03 +0200
Received: from bls34-1-88-168-125-252.fbx.proxad.net ([88.168.125.252]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sat, 26 Jun 2010 10:15:03 +0200
Received: from nicolas.dejean.ietf by bls34-1-88-168-125-252.fbx.proxad.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sat, 26 Jun 2010 10:15:03 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: ipv6@ietf.org
From: Nicolas Déjean <nicolas.dejean.ietf@googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: Consensus call for adoption of draft-hui-6man-rpl-option anddraft-hui-6man-rpl-routing-header
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2010 08:10:43 +0000
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <loom.20100626T100743-539@post.gmane.org>
References: <4C168E3F.1060007@innovationslab.net> <D0B9E8E6-FD2A-42DB-93C0-9EC831BB8618@cs.stanford.edu> <4C1943B4.1050805@acm.org> <E081F04940A14ED5B4B03ACF7677BF29@china.huawei.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org
User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)
X-Loom-IP: 88.168.125.252 (Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; fr; rv:1.9.2.3) Gecko/20100401 Firefox/3.6.3)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 26 Jun 2010 07:01:57 -0700
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2010 08:14:58 -0000

I support both drafts.

Nicolas.