<draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-05.txt>

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Fri, 31 March 2017 15:32 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39E121299AC for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 08:32:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6KzSXyIZ77PF for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 08:32:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22f.google.com (mail-wm0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACFC212706D for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 08:32:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id y22so1633306wmh.0 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 08:32:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:mime-version:subject:message-id:date:cc:to; bh=Z2K1Nx4g3N6TtVYZUjPp3PoT5TeL90R3Hv3M3D/FT/w=; b=ZHaeuzmuq4pRYXb8s+7v3ZTgntu+wzJW3UEJ6LP6v5ZhrLRzbkEZIThWZDsEXG74VF vS1v0J1AdBnYqJEK3v+VEVF0pfz3sTJ/XW2GkrPHdXjG8azbcvMy63fKakX13UZ4KNbi tYmRe62iADb69XF5QiPBe8WasVRVt4s9uwsqy1pVwzqhU+2MqNhmqak+owdePC0OIp2w oLwdwTeksanVFZ3B3WFtxre7bzv9FWTtTxFVAiZmb56CxkZm7oTGvtIhpDCqEjDyzFbt S6QyKctWWB3lk2JnD5J+alOKx0byulg39euG5jpKoGzuOKFBroOhmJI8fSh96hoyPrky qkNw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:subject:message-id:date:cc:to; bh=Z2K1Nx4g3N6TtVYZUjPp3PoT5TeL90R3Hv3M3D/FT/w=; b=EgB7pKiuLXG5TgNblviXRHDHI7XKTc/Ir3gdRcqkKmoXHTLIcwIygPfF5gJkUZcMxm nQ9zB+nZjloUbPqJJT5e3wFLhOGnysPnkHsRHpgUwWs5lXNSY/1bwSh1RZ0P9YWNFN0z 5BOewnyaOHHBa4Lv/pVmIAH38gn9rPzgUFVn8lzGkzmhzwDzSyvsF5mXF0eBhjSN5Q9N 2BVybs/J2xicIohL8lT35dLshOS4uTku2+OKYn3fYDgBgScoGWQhnosA1wOu0YXPqhzZ JlY4Pf/+0hrIYfnB0Xvycf/4lJ1sx6+bMyqbITp/mwaqXWTGnfhEan0GAUMGi0qr+snS /3uA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H2jYQfmTmuQig+0O+Z4aLvjEM4+GjlOhDI0GBFv9NggqrlZf8pmjlNpQGa067+QMQ==
X-Received: by 10.28.95.85 with SMTP id t82mr3470879wmb.107.1490974328176; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 08:32:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from t2001067c03700128c1e8207366ca59f2.v6.meeting.ietf.org (t2001067c03700128c1e8207366ca59f2.v6.meeting.ietf.org. [2001:67c:370:128:c1e8:2073:66ca:59f2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b82sm3324116wmh.4.2017.03.31.08.32.06 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 31 Mar 2017 08:32:07 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_74D19CC5-9530-4D54-94A7-69CE3DFBF965"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Subject: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-05.txt>
Message-Id: <E085A02B-4710-4E3E-96C8-FD89FA700B25@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 10:32:02 -0500
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
To: IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/pzHL0s8M6_TlZW6vzvPpFc0G4u0>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 15:32:14 -0000

Hi,

I published a new version of rfc1981bis (-05).  Links to the document below.

The changes in this version are based on comments in IETF last call reviews by Gorry Fairhurst, Joe Touch, Susan Hares, Stewart Bryant, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef, and Donald Eastlake.  Many thank to the reviewers as I think the document is significantly improved, it is much better aligned with current transport practice.

The changes include:

   o  Clarify that the purpose of PMTUD is to reduce the need
      for IPv6 Fragmentation.

   o  Added text to Introduction about effects on PMTUD when
      ICMPv6 messages are blocked.

   o  Clarified in Section 4. that nodes should validate the
      payload of ICMPv6 PTB messages per RFC4443.

   o  Removed text in Section 5.2 about the number of paths to a
      destination.

   o  Changed title of Section 5.4 to "Packetization layer
      actions".

   o  Clarified first paragraph in Section 5.4 to to cover all
      packetization layers, not just TCP.

   o  Clarified text in Section 5.4 to use normal retransmission
      methods.

   o  Add clarification to Note in Section 5.4 about
      retransmissions.

   o  Removed text in Section 5.4 that described 4.2BSD as it is
      now obsolete.

   o  Removed reference to TP4 in Section 5.5.

   o  Updated text in Section 5.5 about NFS including adding a
      current reference to NFS and removing obsolete text.

   o  Revised text in Section 6 to clarify first attack
      response.

   o  Added new text in Section 6 to clarify the effect of
      ICMPv6 filtering on PMTUD.

   o  Aligned terminology for the packetization layer
      terminology.

   o  Editorial changes.

A diff from the previous version can be found at:

   https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-05.txt

Please review.

This is part of the project to move the core IPv6 specifications to Internet Standard.

Thanks,
Bob

> A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-05.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Robert M. Hinden and posted to the
> IETF repository.
> 
> Name:		draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis
> Revision:	05
> Title:		Path MTU Discovery for IP version 6
> Document date:	2017-03-31
> Group:		6man
> Pages:		18
> URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-05.txt
> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis/
> Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-05
> Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-05
> Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-05
> 
> Abstract:
>   This document describes Path MTU Discovery for IP version 6.  It is
>   largely derived from RFC 1191, which describes Path MTU Discovery for
>   IP version 4.  It obsoletes RFC1981.