IETF Logo Mail Archive

Windows 10 doesn't honour 'M' flag in RA

Naveen Kottapalli <naveen.sarma@gmail.com> Tue, 12 December 2017 07:20 UTC

Return-Path: <naveen.sarma@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56ADC1277BB; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 23:20:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D0vkUT-ZGXGK; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 23:20:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf0-x233.google.com (mail-lf0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4CFC1241FC; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 23:20:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf0-x233.google.com with SMTP id a12so22018002lfe.4; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 23:20:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=H37ulJZoJ2bsC4KS3lsrCHbLt72+TS81HOOernS4rdg=; b=HvTloF/+yuowanKik/WHrbU6pxZQvusGez8hbdWIJCap1j6hAMR23TusjWPciadgk1 YJa4nlD43dL0aD+2LKJoyp2odAUDk+YnTy/vj8FGVry7Sf/Asor8Bh+HsmPRznUc+rir qmrYrcCvcihf1Sv0IUg7GC/JohFiPr/iCqQT2qji2bdT1hm3XMKAP3cWrfVAUJE+JOQw WHhNgXa7Lmp9LCAlujPjax2u59FaO19fym9BsajDL1gGmtISZjTFO4vtGxDa8HXnsos/ m1JvtsY7mqickDGDWpLD22sqBVRkfAocERd0Una2+CXEB/UpFlYLaOvg5rbWIIVAdrkw mDyA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=H37ulJZoJ2bsC4KS3lsrCHbLt72+TS81HOOernS4rdg=; b=ge43dwi6AoOf/l1sWprwB4BnLyQh+QbqLRroVQEywxT6VWPKi4BGqgMHSNuZwAR9da XC4zqOFORh12DBwJc8NDA4p3Y6ve3WGW/FFX5ydMwGep8ZvXSkF3o9U6aqTUtXyfq9+Z LTiJnvoZ0xiBLnumBvsC2Z1eszCALjxJpbZqxKx0XAUu2q2hHcj0tgQJbFsDbs5dofvb mOzsxEPhth4twR1dWp/KwYlnHfaVdw/maLXSPpAnWTZeTSYr2nUX0JUipN3qlt4NmcMy gzC6s4EtWwHgoIshmp1YknFKNUSsTAIBu224XPO0sVWhQnq6dAMuItyYTWOJPDkE6OXY 2XSA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mLsFOImYZwQP8aServ0P/qWhod4rPRce1asRZX3UnNfEO61CnEB 6ZnilOZd2Y0Xz5BgHbH1EJYP8qo9TXqhJsXnusCy5Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBoue3sM61DBOCmuUqBZN2qsBWkhlp48q/6bsl8VEF/4ouEKRy4FRTb5bS2ocHhmXPIPNIhpEpQdk2TJbrZGhCs0=
X-Received: by 10.46.20.5 with SMTP id u5mr1573227ljd.9.1513063252644; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 23:20:52 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.46.2.212 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 23:20:31 -0800 (PST)
From: Naveen Kottapalli <naveen.sarma@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 12:50:31 +0530
Message-ID: <CANFmOtnJiKtBH9WuOjfAAaOxmrQ8SanU1ATiEY_zSA9DbAuUAA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Windows 10 doesn't honour 'M' flag in RA
To: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045fc116b257f405601f7d1f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/sMFQKoi1rAR-QPnFRk4VBZQWgYw>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 07:20:56 -0000

Hello,

In our recent testing, we observed that Windows 10 doesn't honour 'M' flag
in RA.  It's not just Windows 10, same behaviour is observed with latest
Mac OS as well.  Is there any specification reference to support this?

Your valuable input is highly appreciated.

Yours,
Naveen.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email