Questions about CRH

Huzhibo <huzhibo@huawei.com> Thu, 11 March 2021 17:06 UTC

From: Huzhibo <huzhibo@huawei.com>
To: "Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com" <Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com>
CC: "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>
Subject: Questions about CRH
Thread-Topic: Questions about CRH
Thread-Index: AdcWmPgx4bnTUrt5Q7eq5xJA71Ysyg==
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 17:06:35 +0000
Message-ID: <ec728090a5144d6f9de1a02481359ed7@huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/ujQE6Co8O4dsYIxBcCjBSveoRgA>
Precedence: list

Hi Andrew:

Regarding the discussion in the 6man session, I have two questions, hope to have your reply.

1. The SRv6 compression design team has provided a template for comparing different compression solutions, and it will be finished at late MAY. As a network operator, will you try to compare different compression solutions based on the template before making the decision or using CRH no matter what results come out?


2. If I don't remember wrong, two years ago, you said you had implemented the POC of CRH, that is great. But I saw there have been many major changes to CRH. I would like to know whether you have considered the impact of these changes to CRH and whether it is stable so far?

Many thanks and looking forward to your reply.

Best regards,
Zhibo