IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Comments on presentation of draft-lemon-stub-networks-ps-00

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 02 December 2020 23:17 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A09743A15E1 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 15:17:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NO_DNS_FOR_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NCV21pcZaFNn for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 15:16:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk1-x734.google.com (mail-qk1-x734.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::734]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 480A93A15DD for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 15:16:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk1-x734.google.com with SMTP id x25so481923qkj.3 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 15:16:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=Iobjn6liN4W07STOqPwyzUAmtEzPBRKcNrnKWxo9Mqk=; b=VVZDCUAUGd+zhQR+ljCG4/AMLeQsHFipgROjsxgxb+5Prx2wG8xkAWOzj6LmIYRFVK 3SPXPYvhDJVHbjo3JidP/6eUZYh6EuNhdmdye7Mk8r7zFEf38/ieAXcnjaCoco9E+aT2 l2Z0suFAlsKNGKivRhQ73DCxJ8RPOgFm25joio87BqFnNjEkIOtzxcjmE54zvu7ZCf64 1L0PvRlAksNsIJJ6CebcHUOW+Lyv2YGTH+CXXHJ6T4yQ3s4BfagPAS2pvwxosz/HOW1j U4/A2mciXrjmS+OYr4x/LL6Ci4DMV6icO9/i96Rb/WZCR3WXi9zZe/29FtYGOTgHOv/W xu/g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=Iobjn6liN4W07STOqPwyzUAmtEzPBRKcNrnKWxo9Mqk=; b=YqF4NJyPkL3YVuZtK9CjKaoZrY0s0YTCI8rDwfO8G8S+Ym6mrkzAeKYjM7UMVLIV7Z GCWitRbLUEzKNumS9Or6ZnwoYxP720sP34wXoEdnhzuNC61InVOSzNqtzlEmXDYLDMhj pJZrGcvHYXAlN0I5VYJoi2ZV1ZW/260UBeUg3wLhr0UngIR52G3S6XxcKW8OsLi4PlCl Yt18iqkerJkexvhy34G6Rpwofi48g1YYtJO+TpxEGaOw24K2IUQlVvtr6Kj4Id/4KwKH MMrxNQmF8C7UM91LWesMQ+/jkGKae1xgmAdEQn3p6eILfMq/ZmeWHLMMtn3Ph7TCMMIx 1slw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533j42J2mjNqLmFT0g9/lAASIRvjjSTDfKJFkTEzxsnH4I5VKLtx N9ezizUMLyvYmsq+k0esF4uWB6zAwFxF3qzs
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyBodp69TyOGqthcIFjn46oBMzs1KTw3seRJoHMO9avDbYlLcq57BBQ74Rfz/0MJTcP74nKuA==
X-Received: by 2002:a37:a086:: with SMTP id j128mr137413qke.221.1606951017796; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 15:16:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.4.114] (c-24-91-177-160.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [24.91.177.160]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c27sm147987qkk.57.2020.12.02.15.16.57 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 02 Dec 2020 15:16:57 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: Comments on presentation of draft-lemon-stub-networks-ps-00
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 18:16:56 -0500
Message-Id: <23EF7B05-97CB-4E3B-A8DE-F19A300CC8E0@fugue.com>
References: <690121.1606943903@dooku>
Cc: otroan@employees.org, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <690121.1606943903@dooku>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (18C62)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/umzQojFxTTyGJo6WKXG8PX-m2ms>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 23:17:02 -0000

Yeah. I don’t know how to resolve this. 

> On Dec 2, 2020, at 16:36, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> 
> 
> otroan@employees.org wrote:
>> I would be surprised if you after considering all the requirements, and
>> some of the failure cases of the other solutions, that you will not
>> again end up with HNCP as the solution.  At least from a time to market
>> perspective you would imagine that to be a lot quicker than defining
>> something new.
> 
> I think that there are many things that could push one in that direction, but
> at the moment, we have nothing to create the demand for HNCP in home routers.
> 
> So no fax effect, first mover disadvantage => no reason to invest.
> 
> -- 
> ]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [ 
> ]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect  [ 
> ]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [ 
>    
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email