Re: RFC3484 and ORCHID addresses (fwd)
David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie> Fri, 14 March 2008 11:17 UTC
Return-Path: <ipv6-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipv6-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipv6-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAFC73A6BE9; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 04:17:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.797
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.797 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.360, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eyMkvCneogar; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 04:17:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D08928C477; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 04:17:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF4643A6BE9 for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 04:17:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4xe09wjgZ5iD for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 04:17:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from salmon.maths.tcd.ie (salmon.maths.tcd.ie [IPv6:2001:770:10:300::86e2:510b]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id F086D3A6AB5 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 04:16:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from walton.maths.tcd.ie ([134.226.81.10] helo=walton.maths.tcd.ie) by salmon.maths.tcd.ie with SMTP id <aa87048@salmon>; 14 Mar 2008 11:14:33 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:14:30 +0000
From: David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie>
To: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
Subject: Re: RFC3484 and ORCHID addresses (fwd)
Message-ID: <20080314111430.GA89363@walton.maths.tcd.ie>
References: <alpine.LRH.1.00.0803140137490.8914@netcore.fi>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.1.00.0803140137490.8914@netcore.fi>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 01:43:15AM +0200, Pekka Savola wrote: > While we're considering RFC3484 changes, here's one additional > proposed modification to RFC3484 for Linux with ORCHID (RFC 4843) that > is worth serious consideration. (Discussion on the best > implementation choice(s) and glibc changes is still going on.) The default rules also have an entry for 6to4, which is intended to prefer native IPv6 addresses over 6to4. This should probably be generalised to include not just 6to4, but also Teredo and any other similar mechanism that the platform supports. David. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
- RFC3484 and ORCHID addresses (fwd) Pekka Savola
- Re: RFC3484 and ORCHID addresses (fwd) David Malone
- Re: RFC3484 and ORCHID addresses (fwd) Brian E Carpenter