<draft-hinden-6man-rfc2464bis-01>

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Mon, 09 January 2017 20:25 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D99EA129631 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jan 2017 12:25:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id stOB18HCCz8T for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jan 2017 12:25:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wj0-x229.google.com (mail-wj0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c01::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC83A1295CF for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Jan 2017 12:25:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wj0-x229.google.com with SMTP id i20so71211469wjn.2 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 09 Jan 2017 12:25:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:subject:date:message-id:cc:to:mime-version; bh=l+D1yWrGKCNRs1uAA9K67bQGIKXh5Ec7KQQ5Eu7Qbrs=; b=vg5DPkIfOz2GY491cAI8bvrbcOez34KEybD5aY8f7rPQ8XIw2dz5zWSRbZX4UDXWtj zPwTTC8xL1uehKuqZkQX1t0e3vxnoxJgLV2GVAiMtdzFXDj0d29oIdD1lFQgZDXI/LTT BAiN+3Hk++3ua2iuuxw8cDWs57FYq11cmDqZXRHBTeJqbYd7chgkLlnXM54yBt0umxDh TWUlw7QH3Ziwp/+wegyIz0ax89kLG/Q86FHEyR/De9gfppN1RGhvw2UL8rTO+Uui2Gn8 cpSu3YqXx67RLY5JKkHPpKtwab9hoVex1oyX2X/T6xSdP2LzddlaSnSGlMjuc7vDSqWO XuIw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:subject:date:message-id:cc:to:mime-version; bh=l+D1yWrGKCNRs1uAA9K67bQGIKXh5Ec7KQQ5Eu7Qbrs=; b=jNNyebUc9ROGdtL2aTlLZhQ+3Wng5PVWVAQejIBeew1ekbJyZfswFA5P25uIFuy8wo mE+P1neBnW65hpEN6CfkudO00O/RDB4esfaiI45eZ6F0VQmfaHhLNpJ4zqgzvdsougwQ jabFlNqJKqNBbfg7f77OIiuB/nncAhWbob9S6XWtLfQwwRAazxxRCnJR97RPRGmtXqbM tlWOmNSWkjQTRJV10Qfd0JjGE8IHNQoBDux2d8P1mOJp74kknw4OvsD1wCxU4Au889xl 05epeFZSryYEOXU37o9twDuidQwNRMgg2Lh1vFgDyodO/FyJKYVW4a8YajZVwUB/nA7H EDqw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJ8TYlOC3kw2HgVWJWXM52EzuG0z3tYiPQM2/42ae1h/wFY/EI3Ex94OnOrlWZdpg==
X-Received: by 10.194.126.1 with SMTP id mu1mr1199708wjb.194.1483993502134; Mon, 09 Jan 2017 12:25:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.161.14] ([209.97.127.10]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i10sm125744882wjd.15.2017.01.09.12.25.00 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 09 Jan 2017 12:25:01 -0800 (PST)
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_8F8F7E37-87C1-4300-8727-92F03727981D"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Subject: <draft-hinden-6man-rfc2464bis-01>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2017 12:24:55 -0800
Message-Id: <7370FF51-5B19-49BB-A849-435B11F9A2CC@gmail.com>
To: IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/w39Sdki-dx9YIPsExuvfinKml40>
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2017 20:25:06 -0000

Hi,

I published a new version of rfc2464bis <draft-hinden-6man-rfc2464bis-01>.  Links below.

This draft brings in the two updates and errata.  The changes include:

      Incorporate update from draft-ietf-6man-default-iids
      (currently in RFC Editor queue).  Revised Section 4 to say
      IIDs should be formed based on RFC7217 and that it not
      recommended to use hardware based IIDs.

      Incorporate update from RFC6085.  Added to Section 7 that an
      IPv6 multicast packet may be mapped to a unicast Ethernet
      Link layer address and that nodes receiving packets with this
      address mapping should not drop these packets.

      Updates to resolve the open Errata on RFC2464.  These are:

              Errata ID: 430: Correct reference to EUI-64.  Note, the
              corrected URL specified in the Errata isn't working, the
              reference now points to one that does work.

              Errata ID: 4855: This errata is not correct, and will be
              marked as rejected.  No change is required.  Also, the
              text that this Errata proposed to change was removed when
              the update from draft-ietf-6man-default-iids was
              incorporated.

      Editorial changes.

A diff from the previous version can be found at:

   https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-hinden-6man-rfc2464bis-01.txt

I plan to send separate emails on each update, explaining the changes and asking a few questions.

This is part of the project to move the core IPv6 specifications to Internet Standard.

Thanks,
Bob

> 
> A new version of I-D, draft-hinden-6man-rfc2464bis-01.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Robert M. Hinden and posted to the
> IETF repository.
> 
> Name:		draft-hinden-6man-rfc2464bis
> Revision:	01
> Title:		Transmission of IPv6 Packets over Ethernet Networks
> Document date:	2017-01-09
> Group:		Individual Submission
> Pages:		9
> URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hinden-6man-rfc2464bis-01.txt
> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hinden-6man-rfc2464bis/
> Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hinden-6man-rfc2464bis-01
> Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-hinden-6man-rfc2464bis-01
> 
> Abstract:
>   This document specifies the frame format for transmission of IPv6
>   packets and the method of forming IPv6 link-local addresses and
>   statelessly autoconfigured addresses on Ethernet networks.  It also
>   specifies the content of the Source/Target Link-layer Address option
>   used in Router Solicitation, Router Advertisement, Neighbor
>   Solicitation, Neighbor Advertisement and Redirect messages when those
>   messages are transmitted on an Ethernet.
> 
>   This document replaces RFC 2464 "Transmission of IPv6 Packets over
>   Ethernet Networks", which will become historic.
> 
>