6MAN @ IETF92
Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> Thu, 08 January 2015 21:25 UTC
Return-Path: <otroan@employees.org>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 572A61A0383 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Jan 2015 13:25:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.505
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.505 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS=1.506, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XVe5r2NnBEzo for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Jan 2015 13:25:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from banjo.employees.org (banjo.employees.org [198.137.202.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6959A1A00FA for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Jan 2015 13:25:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from banjo.employees.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by banjo.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBC6361EC; Thu, 8 Jan 2015 13:25:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=employees.org; h=from :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :cc:to:mime-version; s=selector1; bh=eXRd1BTZkG+tmAgwJS/OAyDZXuI =; b=mZSEcJIlDq6PAS6AwGeSHFisD695yU6BMWkd49zU44yOUDY/PyCMvmzfOit IYxTmxWtRSREKAaRj8MCwCPob19UbculNWei7l5uuNhhWGCJXtWj3o5sspQIiw3u uK5QFFkRVP9ojRNkNYu5re+JBO0kR3Dx689Mltie03h03bw0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=employees.org; h=from :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :cc:to:mime-version; q=dns; s=selector1; b=JNV0jtLmxr44tV+/DuT/P 8Jvc4pK+4JlZEhVqAwKDSuLy/vGl2FiHecA2Rhx0ivipvbS2CWtjggASeu/Yo7Za zDciHfAA0Dx56V7ZrudW9i9KO+EfixOTySUI6vwPeKEAfx2buCY+tY9jVo7RUSnL Us2qrJvD+tOcWBrPpbyyC0=
Received: from gomlefisk.localdomain (cm-84.215.198.95.getinternet.no [84.215.198.95]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: otroan) by banjo.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 94AC661B1; Thu, 8 Jan 2015 13:25:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by gomlefisk.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3CFF3C60BF6; Thu, 8 Jan 2015 22:25:52 +0100 (CET)
From: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: 6MAN @ IETF92
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 22:25:52 +0100
Message-Id: <36AFE802-3A19-4CCB-9FEB-1D328F3D582A@employees.org>
To: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.1\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.1)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/w7FK0q3JRlee1LdovbNWDxB4h5U>
Cc: 6man Chairs <6man-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 21:25:58 -0000
We have requested a 2.5 hour slot for a 6MAN Working Group meeting at IETF92. The conflict list is as follows: First Priority: 6lo 6tisch dnssd mif sdnrg v6ops softwire dhc homenet Second Priority: alto aqm intarea rtgarea rtgwg savi tcpm We have also requested a Meetecho support in the room in case anyone is remote / need to present remotely. We plan to organise the meeting in three sections as before. Working groups drafts, Active Individual drafts and New Individual drafts. We prioritise in that order. Active individual drafts are drafts that have seen active discussion on the IPv6 list, and the New Individual drafts are ones that are new and/or have not seen a lot of discussion. There is only enough time to give the last category five minutes to allow the authors to do a introduction to the work and then start a discussion on the mailing list. Depending on how full the agenda is we can't guarantee time for new individual drafts. We will send out a request for agenda items mid February. Best regards, Bob and Ole
- 6MAN @ IETF92 Ole Troan