RE: Node Req: Issue31: DHCPv6 text (ignore previous mails)

Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi> Thu, 04 December 2003 18:39 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA07750 for <ipv6-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 13:39:22 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1ARyNW-0001Yb-81 for ipv6-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2003 13:39:07 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id hB4Id6fs005981 for ipv6-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 13:39:06 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1ARyNW-0001YO-2V for ipv6-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2003 13:39:06 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA07707 for <ipv6-web-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 13:38:50 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ARyNQ-00067N-00 for ipv6-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2003 13:39:01 -0500
Received: from [132.151.1.19] (helo=optimus.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ARyNQ-00067K-00 for ipv6-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2003 13:39:00 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1ARyKZ-00013M-25; Thu, 04 Dec 2003 13:36:03 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1ARyK9-00011R-JN for ipv6@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2003 13:35:37 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA07520 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 13:35:22 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ARyK7-000630-00 for ipv6@ietf.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2003 13:35:35 -0500
Received: from netcore.fi ([193.94.160.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ARyK5-00062W-00 for ipv6@ietf.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2003 13:35:33 -0500
Received: from localhost (pekkas@localhost) by netcore.fi (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hB4IWTY10437; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 20:32:29 +0200
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 20:32:29 +0200
From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
To: Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>
cc: john.loughney@nokia.com, narten@us.ibm.com, Bob.Hinden@nokia.com, ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: RE: Node Req: Issue31: DHCPv6 text (ignore previous mails)
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20031204113748.01e0c710@flask.cisco.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0312042030020.10308-100000@netcore.fi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: ipv6-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipv6-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: IP Version 6 Working Group (ipv6) <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>

On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Ralph Droms wrote:
> No, there are not really two versions of DHCPv6 - all of the various message
> exchanges and modes of operation are defined in RFC 3315.
> draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateless-02.txt is an aid to the implementation of
> DHCP that provides other configuration information but not address assignment.

Sure, but then a sentence like "if DHCP is implemented" makes a bit 
sense as some may implement the critical part and some not.  It's not 
a binary yes/no decision.

> It might clarify the text a little to refer to "a node that uses DHCP for
> address assignment" and "a node that uses DHCP to obtain other configuration
> information"; 

Based on the wording, that might be fine.

> I think references to "stateless DHCPv6" are confusing.

Maybe, maybe not.  A brief reference could maybe be added just to make 
the folks realize that there is a implementable and "blessed" subset 
of DHCP.. but the main point is clarity in the body of the 
description.


> At 01:25 PM 12/4/2003 +0200, Pekka Savola wrote:
> >[...]
> >Also, there are basically two versions of "DHCP": the one specified in
> >RFC3315, and the "stateless DHCP", in IESG review at the moment.  It
> >is not clear to which you're referring to here.
> >
> >--
> >Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
> >Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
> >Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
> >
> >
> >
> >--------------------------------------------------------------------
> >IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> >ipv6@ietf.org
> >Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> >--------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings


--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------