Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-6man-impatient-nud-02.txt

joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Sun, 05 August 2012 18:17 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC16321F854F for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Aug 2012 11:17:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.307
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.307 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MISSING_HEADERS=1.292, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tOkwHY3y2fLy for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Aug 2012 11:17:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 380B721F854D for <6man@ietf.org>; Sun, 5 Aug 2012 11:17:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from joels-MacBook-Air.local ([206.191.100.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q75IH41p045583 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for <6man@ietf.org>; Sun, 5 Aug 2012 18:17:04 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
Message-ID: <501EB8A5.8040609@bogus.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2012 11:17:09 -0700
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120717 Thunderbird/15.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-6man-impatient-nud-02.txt
References: <20120731234819.20604.39168.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <50186F50.8090106@acm.org>
In-Reply-To: <50186F50.8090106@acm.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (nagasaki.bogus.com [147.28.0.81]); Sun, 05 Aug 2012 18:17:04 +0000 (UTC)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 05 Aug 2012 12:21:51 -0700
Cc: 6man@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2012 18:17:05 -0000

I just wanted to say that we revved this to remove pointers to expired 
drafts replacing them instead with a pointer to 
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6583 and some minor word-smithing.

The substance of the draft in particular the suggested algorithm has not 
changed.


On 7/31/12 4:50 PM, Erik Nordmark wrote:
>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: New Version Notification for 
> draft-ietf-6man-impatient-nud-02.txt
> Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 16:48:19 -0700
> From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
> To: <nordmark@cisco.com>
> CC: <igor@yahoo-inc.com>
>
>
> A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-6man-impatient-nud-02.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Erik Nordmark and posted to the
> IETF repository.
>
> Filename:     draft-ietf-6man-impatient-nud
> Revision:     02
> Title:         Neighbor Unreachability Detection is too impatient
> Creation date:     2012-07-31
> WG ID:         6man
> Number of pages: 8
> URL: 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-6man-impatient-nud-02.txt
> Status: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-impatient-nud
> Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-impatient-nud-02
> Diff: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-6man-impatient-nud-02
>
> Abstract:
>    IPv6 Neighbor Discovery includes Neighbor Unreachability Detection.
>    That function is very useful when a host has an alternative, for
>    instance multiple default routers, since it allows the host to switch
>    to the alternative in short time.  This time is 3 seconds after the
>    node starts probing by default.  However, if there are no
>    alternatives, this is far too impatient.  This document specifies
>    relaxed rules for Neighbor Discovery retransmissions that allows an
>    implementation to choose different timeout behavior based on whether
>    or not there are alternatives.
>
>
>
>
>
> The IETF Secretariat
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>