Re: routers and SADR selection in combination with ULA and GUA

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Sun, 22 March 2015 11:29 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA5CC1A8A8E for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 04:29:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.661
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.661 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7lhEn33yEe-y for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 04:29:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04CA51A8A71 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 04:29:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 16429A1; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 12:29:33 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1427023773; bh=H4SKZeluXZbMXuMEJWvWPF4XEDQnhzXzG4yPD68SOU4=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=lkKZopmrS/LDP5cejQ5O8o33gq7eEp7w3vOefy+agejFTEVRHv/Zj2a3xYO6rPcXB /cQsvyCkEQ8h2637mKWT7EiZWh5jg1EkK0RCELKrzgqMzsEbeP7S4MnfEj2a/Q4Nnm kzGwEpUkjElXW2+vZFi4Z/CPEs0pSeQ1Ww/pXe10=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 082409F; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 12:29:33 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 12:29:33 +0100
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: sarikaya@ieee.org
Subject: Re: routers and SADR selection in combination with ULA and GUA
In-Reply-To: <CAC8QAceZSkBN322TWR++Pb-moqXo5RTz1Ycznwxy-0kd7MpjoQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1503221227360.20507@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1503181151050.20507@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CAC8QAcdeKabmwFNE3QDtDj=Y0N2XXC=nFcO5in6DzMOV=nTh5Q@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1503190528240.20507@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CAC8QAceZSkBN322TWR++Pb-moqXo5RTz1Ycznwxy-0kd7MpjoQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/xvZpAjwHF-j_TSCgX1C6MFKmvNc>
Cc: "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 11:29:37 -0000

On Fri, 20 Mar 2015, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:

>> I don't see how any of section 5 applies to what I wrote in my email. I
>> don't see how 6724#5.5 applies either.
>>
>> These are all talking about hosts with dynamic configuration derived from
>> receiving addresses using DHCPv6 or SLAAC. My case has static configuration
>> only. One might say 6724#6 should be applied even for routers that normally
>> use the strong host model for generating ICMP error messages, but I can't
>> find that recommendation anywhere.
>
> Mikael, I think you inadvertently confused source address with source
> address dependent routing or SADR. I think you are talking about
> source address selection in an ICMP message not SADR.

Well, it wasn't my intention to talk about SADR, but with the strong host 
model it's kind of hard to completely disregard SADR. Otoh Ole told me all 
routers use the weak model, so this shouldn't be a problem.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se