Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-resilient-rs-04.txt

Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> Tue, 11 November 2014 20:02 UTC

Return-Path: <otroan@employees.org>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6C171A0210 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 12:02:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.595
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.595 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0KCI5IT-WFaq for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 12:02:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from banjo.employees.org (banjo.employees.org [IPv6:2001:1868:205::19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A49281A1B5E for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 12:01:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from banjo.employees.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by banjo.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A00D616C for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 12:01:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=employees.org; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s= selector1; bh=bZkOhmquQ8xSqXScA24SmBiX/2Y=; b=L9rBT1tVU86vbuTIWx Zs4I7y288UoegAiNhBxkvKiDkeZTNIXUJYktesp/MWZ78E4rJnlvZFq6dTxxmt4u /hsDJSsvKINOqrmsU5exV3J44ISsEjpoO8Y/7wp00L6teq2KZ8NRe8sS7LhrhyI3 fB4nvrVFPPBMbxG82VcFJmg+8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=employees.org; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; q=dns; s= selector1; b=kyoEbBlnQkj2leAJze8ftNXBchlvKdF1m2EUNeSdfVdNmSA40gK 1cI1OHkBAH2tqIh2mO85UfbCYV+5JMyAizNGCnDc8lVd3KNA6g8otcVEtHhReWcr KJQ7kc9sCKyZGnE36kc+yhhu2TzyQRUNTIQHhfyyDbrJdGKN2Mx4NPp0=
Received: from gomlefisk.localdomain (dhcp-abbf.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.171.191]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: otroan) by banjo.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 66BE46161 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 12:01:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by gomlefisk.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97B2438D50CC for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 10:01:43 -1000 (HST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.0 \(1990.1\))
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-resilient-rs-04.txt
From: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <20141015025022.2238.45373.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 10:01:43 -1000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <ADBD3983-0DEC-4CF0-A7CE-3F42A4495248@employees.org>
References: <20141015025022.2238.45373.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1990.1)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/yi6UrdfUFyZ96oG0Yvxct3SkKek
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 20:02:13 -0000

shouldn't this sentence from the abstract be deleted:

   Furthermore, on some links, unsolicited multicast
   Router Advertisements are never sent and the mechanism in this
   document is intended to work even in such scenarios.

cheers,
Ole


> On 14 Oct 2014, at 16:50 , internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the IPv6 Maintenance Working Group of the IETF.
> 
>        Title           : Packet loss resiliency for Router Solicitations
>        Authors         : Suresh Krishnan
>                          Dmitry Anipko
>                          Dave Thaler
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-6man-resilient-rs-04.txt
> 	Pages           : 6
> 	Date            : 2014-10-14
> 
> Abstract:
>   When an interface on a host is initialized, the host transmits Router
>   Solicitations in order to minimize the amount of time it needs to
>   wait until the next unsolicited multicast Router Advertisement is
>   received.  In certain scenarios, these router solicitations
>   transmitted by the host might be lost.  This document specifies a
>   mechanism for hosts to cope with the loss of the initial Router
>   Solicitations.  Furthermore, on some links, unsolicited multicast
>   Router Advertisements are never sent and the mechanism in this
>   document is intended to work even in such scenarios.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-resilient-rs/
> 
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-resilient-rs-04
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-6man-resilient-rs-04
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------