Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-10: (with COMMENT)

Kathleen Moriarty <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 22 April 2017 14:45 UTC

Return-Path: <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F19912426E; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 07:45:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kathleen Moriarty <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis@ietf.org, Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>, 6man-chairs@ietf.org, otroan@employees.org, ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-10: (with COMMENT)
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.50.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <149287235711.25885.5896012496912146334.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2017 07:45:57 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/z7QKffpJWjYYmq2CYssBsomulhU>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2017 14:45:57 -0000

Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-10: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for updating the Security Considerations section, I was glad to
see the references added to the fragmentation work that had already been
done.  If the TLS and SSH reference remain in the document, references
would be good - RFC7525 and RFC4250-4254, but my preference would be to
delete the sentence as this document is about IPv6 and developers and
implementers of this standard wouldn't need those references, IPsec is
enough.