[ire] Header question (draft-arias-noguchi-dnrd-objects-mapping-03)

Klaus Malorny <Klaus.Malorny@knipp.de> Fri, 03 May 2013 10:06 UTC

Return-Path: <Klaus.Malorny@knipp.de>
X-Original-To: ire@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ire@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 753E321F9593 for <ire@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 May 2013 03:06:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7HLuiSsuDlZf for <ire@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 May 2013 03:06:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kmx10a.knipp.de (clust3b.bbone.knipp.de [195.253.6.85]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 321F721F9488 for <ire@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 May 2013 03:06:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kmx10a.knipp.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 260E562; Fri, 3 May 2013 12:06:05 +0200 (MESZ)
X-Knipp-VirusScanned: Yes
Received: from kmx10a.knipp.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kmx10a.knipp.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10004) with ESMTP id E2WIhtLTrxNn; Fri, 3 May 2013 12:05:57 +0200 (MESZ)
Received: from hp9000.do.knipp.de (hp9000.do.knipp.de [195.253.2.54]) by kmx10a.knipp.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id F095161; Fri, 3 May 2013 12:05:56 +0200 (MESZ)
Received: from [195.253.2.27] (mclane.do.knipp.de [195.253.2.27]) by hp9000.do.knipp.de (@(#)Sendmail version 8.13.3 - Revision 1.000 - 1st August,2006/8.13.3) with ESMTP id r43A5uwP009821; Fri, 3 May 2013 12:05:56 +0200 (MESZ)
Message-ID: <51838C04.2050000@knipp.de>
Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 12:05:56 +0200
From: Klaus Malorny <Klaus.Malorny@knipp.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:23.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/23.0a1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ire@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [ire] Header question (draft-arias-noguchi-dnrd-objects-mapping-03)
X-BeenThere: ire@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Internet Registration Escrow discussion list." <ire.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ire>, <mailto:ire-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ire>
List-Post: <mailto:ire@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ire-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ire>, <mailto:ire-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 10:06:12 -0000

Hi,

I have a question to the Header object (section 5.9). Sorry if this has been 
asked/answered already, I just subscribed to the list in order to clarify an 
understanding problem that came up and did not want to walk through all the 
previous posts.

The question is rather simple: is the Header object mandatory, and if so, may it 
also be placed at the end of the deposit (which should be possible from an XML 
schema standpoint)? One the one hand, we would like to avoid the extra counting 
in the database, on the other hand we would like to avoid to build up the whole 
XML document in the memory first just to insert the header at the top after 
having counted the objects during the generation of their XML representation.

Regards,

Klaus