Re: [ire] About Host Data Issue

"liushuo@knet" <liushuo@knet.cn> Thu, 16 May 2013 09:28 UTC

Return-Path: <liushuo@knet.cn>
X-Original-To: ire@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ire@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B23E221F8756 for <ire@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 May 2013 02:28:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.356
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.356 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.650, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7SfW4uU-Tauy for <ire@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 May 2013 02:28:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cnnic.cn (unknown [218.241.105.202]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 6617821F8605 for <ire@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 May 2013 02:28:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-EYOUMAIL-SMTPAUTH: liushuo@knet.cn
Received: from unknown203.119.80.47 (HELO stuart-knet) (203.119.80.47) by 218.241.118.7 with SMTP; Thu, 16 May 2013 17:28:37 +0800
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 17:28:35 +0800
From: "liushuo@knet" <liushuo@knet.cn>
To: "Gustavo Lozano" <gustavo.lozano@icann.org>
References: <CDB8F9C1.12423%gustavo.lozano@icann.org>
X-Priority: 3
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.0.1.92[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2013051617283528597159@knet.cn>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart268555123155_=----"
Cc: ire <ire@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ire] About Host Data Issue
X-BeenThere: ire@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: liushuo <liushuo@knet.cn>
List-Id: "Internet Registration Escrow discussion list." <ire.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ire>, <mailto:ire-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ire>
List-Post: <mailto:ire@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ire-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ire>, <mailto:ire-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 09:28:52 -0000

Hi All,

So it is recommended that the external hosts could not be included, right?

Regards,
Stuart

From: Gustavo Lozano
Date: 2013-05-15 23:44
To: Francisco Obispo; James Mitchell
CC: liushuo; ire
Subject: Re: [ire] About Host Data Issue
Hi All,

Comments in line.

Regards,
Gustavo

On 5/15/13 8:35 AM, "Francisco Obispo" <fobispo@isc.org>; wrote:

>Hi James,
>
>
>
>On May 15, 2013, at 7:18 AM, James Mitchell
><james.mitchell@ausregistry.com.au>; wrote:
>
>> I see no need for a deposit to include external hosts, however their
>>omission may complicate the process of restoring a registry.
>
>
>I believe they both need to be included, because the sponsorship
>component is very important.
>
>
>
>>  Furthermore, I'd expect escrow agents check that all name-server
>>associations have corresponding host objects, where host objects are
>>used.
>> 
>
>It would be ideal if we could get some clarity with regards of what type
>of checks Escrow agents are supposed to be doing.

The answer is C + other validations (e.g. NNDN comparison with Domain Name)

>
>They could technically:
>
>A) Verify just the signature
>B) Verify the signature + schema
>C) Verify the signature + schema + object relationships
>D) Do none of the above
>
>
>
>> Regards,
>> James
>
>Francisco Obispo 
>Director of Applications and Services - ISC
>email: fobispo@isc.org
>Phone: +1 650 423 1374 || INOC-DBA *3557* NOC
>PGP KeyID = B38DB1BE
>
>_______________________________________________
>ire mailing list
>ire@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ire