Re: [ire] About Host Data Issue

["liushuo@knet" <[e-mail]>]

Hi All,

So it is recommended that the external hosts could not be included, right?

Regards,
Stuart

From: Gustavo Lozano
Date: 2013-05-15 23:44
To: Francisco Obispo; James Mitchell
CC: liushuo; ire
Subject: Re: [ire] About Host Data Issue
Hi All,

Comments in line.

Regards,
Gustavo

On 5/15/13 8:35 AM, "Francisco Obispo" <[e-mail]> wrote:

>Hi James,
>
>
>
>On May 15, 2013, at 7:18 AM, James Mitchell
><[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>> I see no need for a deposit to include external hosts, however their
>>omission may complicate the process of restoring a registry.
>
>
>I believe they both need to be included, because the sponsorship
>component is very important.
>
>
>
>>  Furthermore, I'd expect escrow agents check that all name-server
>>associations have corresponding host objects, where host objects are
>>used.
>> 
>
>It would be ideal if we could get some clarity with regards of what type
>of checks Escrow agents are supposed to be doing.

The answer is C + other validations (e.g. NNDN comparison with Domain Name)

>
>They could technically:
>
>A) Verify just the signature
>B) Verify the signature + schema
>C) Verify the signature + schema + object relationships
>D) Do none of the above
>
>
>
>> Regards,
>> James
>
>Francisco Obispo 
>Director of Applications and Services - ISC
>email: [e-mail]
>Phone: [phone] || INOC-DBA *3557* NOC
>PGP KeyID = B38DB1BE
>
>_______________________________________________
>ire mailing list
>[e-mail]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ire