[ire] About Host Data Issue

"liushuo@knet" <liushuo@knet.cn> Wed, 15 May 2013 08:57 UTC

Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 16:57:14 +0800
From: "liushuo@knet" <liushuo@knet.cn>
To: ire <ire@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2013051516571376226516@knet.cn>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart613855837285_=----"
Subject: [ire] About Host Data Issue
Precedence: list
Reply-To: liushuo <liushuo@knet.cn>

Hi All,

We are puzzled with the host data in deposit, we used to think that the host data should be the name servers associated with domain in the deposit, in this case some other gTLD's NSes may be  included in deposits such as ns1.google.com,etc. 
But now we tend to believe that the hosts under the same registry should be the answer, that is only the hosts under new gTLD 'xn--fiq64b' should be included in xn--fiq64b's deposit file. 

Are we right? Or both of the hosts under the registry and the NSes which may not under the registry should be included?


Regards,
Stuart

[ire] About Host Data Issue liushuo@knet
Re: [ire] About Host Data Issue Gould, James
Re: [ire] About Host Data Issue James Mitchell
Re: [ire] About Host Data Issue Francisco Obispo
Re: [ire] About Host Data Issue Gustavo Lozano
Re: [ire] About Host Data Issue liushuo@knet