[irs-discuss] Now you're all awake!

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Tue, 13 November 2012 13:07 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F360621F85E7 for <irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 05:07:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wVE7TewR3po8 for <irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 05:07:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (asmtp2.iomartmail.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B17F21F8573 for <irs-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 05:07:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain []) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qADD7ZSJ020294 for <irs-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 13:07:35 GMT
Received: from 950129200 ([]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qADD7Yji020277 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <irs-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 13:07:34 GMT
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: <irs-discuss@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 13:07:37 -0000
Message-ID: <03ba01cdc19f$daef7760$90ce6620$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: Ac3Bn9Y5Hh6s2viqTbmPXB6mEaccAw==
Content-Language: en-gb
Subject: [irs-discuss] Now you're all awake!
X-BeenThere: irs-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: "Interface to The Internet Routing System \(IRS\)" <irs-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/irs-discuss>, <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/irs-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:irs-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss>, <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 13:07:47 -0000

Can we have some constructive discussion about which use cases to include in the
charter and which ones to exclude.

I am pretty sure I heard the BoF say that they wanted to reduce the scope by
cutting down on the use cases, and as I said at the meeting I am worried that
this just means that each person wants to limit the scope their favorite use
case. So we will only get victory if there is considerable convergence on what
the favorite is.