Re: [irs-discuss] An idea ... MTR + IRS

Scott Whyte <swhyte@google.com> Fri, 10 August 2012 22:51 UTC

Return-Path: <swhyte@google.com>
X-Original-To: irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A7A711E8087 for <irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:51:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IkvpWrD6yEnf for <irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:51:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f44.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f44.google.com [209.85.215.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94A9221F8598 for <irs-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:51:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lahm15 with SMTP id m15so1168893lah.31 for <irs-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:51:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-system-of-record; bh=/bGyPiViA/nHIcUheKILdjrCE9PerjdQGpIp0YpD7Dg=; b=FHFZYDSDGmlL/tYqIQ4cSng8Yas4tmW4ggBZZE1Q0oLGrzKJp/Ju1Sq2XOJ+12zRgB 52fe1XAgAPtVb5EntX7Upx2k6YNl5WxUTTRS8d1fHhm9EYShU/JHr2oOLR72yBPga5An GpB5S7pg+sOS22ebkAlgDNJweDRKB3RGaMNmSKJle7oJcY8iQO5KFip7QgAjbkp8Znuq Ro1zcLdb93iMN4ht+8MP7n6PmrPka/mHGAL0bQFaggv0hUXx7MNHEfowFZv4z6+GRL9L OqxB9uC7r1OrKLEXZBJ4cxO1YE1aFZwfvmhjEZd68qt3hhatSjv2OPr1YwmnejNxgFG3 B8MA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-system-of-record:x-gm-message-state; bh=/bGyPiViA/nHIcUheKILdjrCE9PerjdQGpIp0YpD7Dg=; b=koO4SKNx+2lA2T3AIYWJ2tkxMvAl2+/CoruDQ6vhUPXPhkUcuUUla25JGcucDperVI bUMVZAfQbBLOovkvobE3nglSGkpJdwkXy0tiWuqBBNm1jz2i33jy0Y4IC4vZnRl9ln+i QXz7pgk9ZswGJIJS9wPvb4OKJf7ikWwbpqgYytMAHHm8pjNjDKFYQEmklwMPjZ+P34HD y34LZi2KtO39janRHlJxAjpEK0OvueOSAcNgKdWH44bJg4ifEz6cK4xcTzkNRilRPKEE x6oIJs9KYViVFi2SiOno2RcOHs0456y53r/OCN+XEvxkkv8YpuX268ZME8ojFo/GkRHJ ZE5w==
Received: by 10.152.105.132 with SMTP id gm4mr4419193lab.8.1344639111459; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:51:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.105.132 with SMTP id gm4mr4419180lab.8.1344639111322; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:51:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.38.38 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:51:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <50223B25.9080401@raszuk.net>
References: <501B150C.9080304@raszuk.net> <CACKN6JFMxAiF63XPyUtGxE85iA1WpCe9S_y=yB684HA=57OsgQ@mail.gmail.com> <50223B25.9080401@raszuk.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:51:51 -0700
Message-ID: <CAG=Jvvg=rsX9qBqEkJuA3PaFXsneDhOUaMSNWpPq1hFFSK2EDg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Scott Whyte <swhyte@google.com>
To: robert@raszuk.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-System-Of-Record: true
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnx/FoBFE/3y1ibw/lSyPMkF5DCJB4rSGu50yfWJ4qSNNdWaJTUMuDnhc8oR/3GJcfrr9zTKo3NOubKDPKZnhkzoDKUyeD1O5QjRuyksQD7H7Ijv75If51QHEDQwZh74cqG+Z5pfjL7SnwwB9OFdQYbKOlPc9nBQZxAQjIl8PRESsKfLZX1mhev6y2boH3luS+P2TLi
Cc: Edward Crabbe <edc@google.com>, "irs-discuss@ietf.org" <irs-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [irs-discuss] An idea ... MTR + IRS
X-BeenThere: irs-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interface to The Internet Routing System \(IRS\)" <irs-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/irs-discuss>, <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/irs-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:irs-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss>, <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 22:51:53 -0000

On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 3:10 AM, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>; wrote:
> Ed,
>
>
>> If topo information export is in scope (which I believe it is) and
>> PBR route injection with nh recursion to rib (and thus connected
>> routes) is in scope (which I'm quite sure it is) then yes, this is in
>> scope.
>
> Great !
>
>
>> Although I'm not sure what it has to do with OF /OF controllers? ;P
>
>
> One could observe that entire OF can be very easily mapped to well
> implemented and scaable PBR ;)

I guess that depends on what you define Policy Based ROUTING to be ;)

-Scott

>
> Best,
>
> R.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> irs-discuss mailing list
> irs-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss



-- 
panem et circenses - a winning strategy for over 2000 years!