Re: [irs-discuss] An idea ... MTR + IRS

Edward Crabbe <edc@google.com> Tue, 07 August 2012 22:20 UTC

Return-Path: <edc@google.com>
X-Original-To: irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 009ED21F846C for <irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 15:20:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.143
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.143 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.833, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, SARE_HTML_USL_OBFU=1.666, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sh-rywN3lmUA for <irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 15:20:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gg0-f172.google.com (mail-gg0-f172.google.com [209.85.161.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4705211E80D5 for <irs-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 15:20:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ggnc4 with SMTP id c4so151809ggn.31 for <irs-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 15:20:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-system-of-record; bh=LmskkzfKhlGUCJO8Zdsc9O5JSfmTL/TMCbeT34Ybg3w=; b=Jf11BMH4bl3Y0zet8ObmNk7DdmQh2z+twM+IDxmyD2tidqRsQhJPdGczYPkXfa0QA4 HZveSrKSIuO3m6KAqRbQOHV6PyjTi9X8mpmwHaey/n9xbSVyM2gx1m+WOtqhBBL7xQEv 4VlCM74huV5iyTvcphY4IQLRNO06GTyBqZtjnbzdCInCGdSNzZUxMrLwjfVyK1sSbLK/ lXds/Z2A7P+xJPyLIX92L02zCEf1OrPCA5ymKK8bmkhTfbeCmqSA7blopevDjlGjTD2o o1WqKMi5oBBS4tH7zhbbCmovu+xMTaClrtV/KAr6m54vNo3Z01ZB88uIwK936csCyCEj S0IA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-system-of-record:x-gm-message-state; bh=LmskkzfKhlGUCJO8Zdsc9O5JSfmTL/TMCbeT34Ybg3w=; b=pg1179I4XRTFL0PQpSqcKG7xH4sGCK9Zqx23cHgHaN4ZHa/GGufsb/QTgC8Iqkxh4F RRRoTqSoIcxSnRfWu8ZzGqzvE+s/mytFGPPY5v+J1h1lMzU1FAdjiS8+TVxXnbq+7oqQ CJ7daGLbNMCBH7sWFoMZNguK38XQQXwfkCNvyNeEWDQ28bgPL6HiVuNo4JohKnoYqVbq MaOeYVFUsovAnc3/ZNCe0Xo/dw/uk11JZf/pkTQ+V2pSxin0UY8Zv35wge6/mR8Ho2Sv D3z7ULv8MXK/suR7glY1kPXtETM0L8r0ZEB4kS6lnm2xEv/3et7LfR5NQwSw1bS1XIen nS+w==
Received: by 10.42.155.135 with SMTP id u7mr3070309icw.25.1344378021392; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 15:20:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.42.155.135 with SMTP id u7mr3070300icw.25.1344378021283; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 15:20:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.237.67 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 15:19:40 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <501B150C.9080304@raszuk.net>
References: <501B150C.9080304@raszuk.net>
From: Edward Crabbe <edc@google.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 15:19:40 -0700
Message-ID: <CACKN6JFMxAiF63XPyUtGxE85iA1WpCe9S_y=yB684HA=57OsgQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: robert@raszuk.net
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba6e8c5a67089404c6b46661
X-System-Of-Record: true
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkaQArsv7hdS56qXz/lQw02aFZ4FcRDZnrNYVRE0ai9UpMl0pcWj78Oneaq34IH9JiO/IbNr/mb6UiAxDqxlQHZJQFmOXF4qCWZavllUY3b9fQTv+0E/DyhEsPagxGN2uVxtJ1ORQwHEcrR1yUhCt3Zr3g1ratlzyc0jmKawsvtimPaFjiZDIiWLW1lRWOK2dHak75f
Cc: "irs-discuss@ietf.org" <irs-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [irs-discuss] An idea ... MTR + IRS
X-BeenThere: irs-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interface to The Internet Routing System \(IRS\)" <irs-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/irs-discuss>, <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/irs-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:irs-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss>, <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 22:20:23 -0000

Robert,

If topo information export is in scope (which I believe it is) and PBR
route injection with nh recursion to rib (and thus connected routes) is in
scope (which I'm quite sure it is) then yes, this is in scope.

Although I'm not sure what it has to do with OF /OF controllers? ;P

On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>; wrote:

> Hi,
>
> This morning Scott mentioned that he would like to use IRS to shut down
> all protocols and just be able to write to RIB. Now James said that he
> would like to get a network topology as "every OpenFlow controller requires
> this"
>
> Both connected together resulted in an idea of using
> multi-topology-routing where your base topology discovers physical link
> connectivity graph while other topologies could be programmed by external
> entities example: OF controllers or any other external to routers network
> intelligence oracles to deliver actual services ?
>
> Would that be in scope of IRS effort ? If so what would be the proposed
> "write to RIB" set of protocols ? Would you support OF 1.3 even if one
> would be happy to lock such topologies only to software/programmable
> switching paths ?
>
> Best rgs,
> R.
> ______________________________**_________________
> irs-discuss mailing list
> irs-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/**listinfo/irs-discuss<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss>
>