IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Isis-wg] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-isis-te-metric-extensions-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

"Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com> Mon, 15 February 2016 20:34 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17F1E1AD05B; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 12:34:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.507
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.507 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iaJnWp0wQX2K; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 12:34:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D8011ACF6C; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 12:34:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1054; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1455568440; x=1456778040; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=rm6cR0CKZlCJUNr9Ia6rx5BO5ElZF81NjTFAAsZNSpA=; b=NzhWfmfJiOLRLcf1jlqpO+rDtKQsM5JokdNkyi4WDHueKbPm/SFFCimP /XuG7mNBdeMd6NfzQVM+6GEaDufINErf4gTCuMPY1xB2XI5s+iBA5e4RT SDtu5GBe1RwKbw5QFw90vJ3y9VBr5Y4PkXzwmuQBvwHs1rOooX6JhQ4N+ M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ACAgC8NcJW/5NdJa1dgzpSbQa4A4ITAQ2BZyOFagKBODgUAQEBAQEBAYEKhEIBAQR5EAIBCBguMiUCBAENBYgaDrcUAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBEQSGEYQ1hDCEPAEEjV+FD4QLAY1UjnSOPQEeAQFCgi+BNGqHU3wBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,452,1449532800"; d="scan'208";a="238889947"
Received: from rcdn-core-11.cisco.com ([173.37.93.147]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Feb 2016 20:33:59 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-008.cisco.com (xch-rcd-008.cisco.com [173.37.102.18]) by rcdn-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u1FKXxaE002850 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 15 Feb 2016 20:33:59 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) by XCH-RCD-008.cisco.com (173.37.102.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 14:33:59 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 14:33:58 -0600
From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
To: "Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)" <sprevidi@cisco.com>, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Thread-Topic: Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-isis-te-metric-extensions-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHRY3kugncgGUC02EGYSKLTKPfDlg==
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 20:33:58 +0000
Message-ID: <D2E7A01F.11010A%aretana@cisco.com>
References: <20160202000623.2041.75747.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <0313B05C-9CAF-4629-A598-C97CFE33AF8F@cisco.com> <96D0C84E-DCAC-4905-B0C0-9085010CB7B1@cooperw.in> <F5E7BA79-8013-49F2-B6CA-93F971393B26@cisco.com> <870A3143-5031-4099-9B38-F64630024BD5@cooperw.in> <D2DFB734.10E5DF%aretana@cisco.com> <69162644-DF77-453F-98C9-A558E2F2F3C0@cooperw.in> <3FB383D2-EC6D-4EAF-A126-6F18680C65CE@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <3FB383D2-EC6D-4EAF-A126-6F18680C65CE@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.117.15.5]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <067C1F0CE2C7AD46B0E3254874E813C5@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/isis-wg/3nmRWofCN3kKzi2BHfpcH4X68Po>
Cc: "isis-wg@ietf.org" <isis-wg@ietf.org>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-isis-te-metric-extensions@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-isis-te-metric-extensions@ietf.org>, "isis-chairs@ietf.org" <isis-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-isis-te-metric-extensions-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/isis-wg/>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 20:34:02 -0000

On 2/11/16, 4:37 AM, "Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)" <sprevidi@cisco.com>
wrote:

>>On Feb 9, 2016, at 10:39 PM, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> wrote:
>>Hi Alvaro,
>>The changes look good to me. I think this (unchanged) text in Section 5
>>is still unclear though:
>>For sub-TLVs which include an A-bit (except min/max
>>      delay), an additional threshold SHOULD be included
>>      corresponding to the threshold for which the performance
>>      is considered anomalous (and sub-TLVs with the A-bit are
>>      sent). The A-bit is cleared when the sub-TLV's performance
>>      has been below (or re-crosses) this threshold for an
>>      advertisement interval(s) to permit fail back.
>>Why is the min/max delay sub-TLV exempted from this recommendation?
>
>
>it looks we missed that one and the text "except min/max delay² should be
>removed.

The latest (-11) addresses this last change!

Diff from previous version:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-isis-te-metric-extensions-11


Thanks!

Alvaro.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email