[Isis-wg] draft-bowers-spring-adv-per-algorithm-label-blocks-00

<bruno.decraene@orange.com> Mon, 18 May 2015 12:12 UTC

Return-Path: <bruno.decraene@orange.com>
X-Original-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6A1E1A8F33; Mon, 18 May 2015 05:12:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9q3OYxJEhgaH; Mon, 18 May 2015 05:12:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias243.francetelecom.com [80.12.204.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC0431A8BB2; Mon, 18 May 2015 05:12:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omfeda08.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.201]) by omfeda14.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 51C862AC2AE; Mon, 18 May 2015 14:12:08 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme2.itn.ftgroup (unknown [10.114.31.72]) by omfeda08.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 18ED0384072; Mon, 18 May 2015 14:12:08 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from OPEXCLILM21.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::e92a:c932:907e:8f06]) by OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::60a9:abc3:86e6:2541%19]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Mon, 18 May 2015 14:12:08 +0200
From: <bruno.decraene@orange.com>
To: "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: draft-bowers-spring-adv-per-algorithm-label-blocks-00
Thread-Index: AdCRY6NNtDQxGWQYQ1uPPmaKOgYh9A==
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 12:12:07 +0000
Message-ID: <30543_1431951128_5559D718_30543_8134_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A0F585E6E@OPEXCLILM21.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.168.234.1]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-PMX-Version: 6.2.1.2478543, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2015.5.18.112715
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/isis-wg/72t76NH3dcShjU0kd3c2BIhdhE4>
Cc: "ospf@ietf.org" <ospf@ietf.org>, "isis-wg@ietf.org" <isis-wg@ietf.org>
Subject: [Isis-wg] draft-bowers-spring-adv-per-algorithm-label-blocks-00
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/isis-wg/>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 12:12:12 -0000

Folks,

This document discusses two options for configuring SID for additional IGP algorithms such as SPF based on delay, MRT blue/red for Fast ReRoute...
At first, the handling of additional IGP algorithms may be seen as a second priority for the SPRING WG. However, this discussion may impact IGP encodings discussed in the OSPF and IS-IS WG. Such IGP extensions have been discussed for some time, with multiple interoperable implementations and expected deployments in the near future. Hence if change is needed, the more we wait, probably the harder.

We feel that starting the discussion on the mailing list now would be better than waiting for Pragues.

So we'd like to encourage the WG to read this document and comment it on the mailing list.
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-bowers-spring-adv-per-algorithm-label-blocks-00.txt
	

Thanks,
Bruno, John


> -----Original Message-----
> From: spring [mailto:spring-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Chris Bowers
> Sent: Friday, April 03, 2015 7:16 PM
> To: spring@ietf.org
> Subject: [spring] FW: New Version Notification for draft-bowers-spring-adv-
> per-algorithm-label-blocks-00.txt
> 
> All,
> 
> I'd like to bring this new draft to the attention of the SPRING working group.
> 
> The draft discusses two options for associating SR labels with destination-
> based forwarding next-hops computed by different algorithms.  It would be
> useful for the SPRING working group to address this topic in order to provide
> guidance to the isis and ospf working groups with respect to encodings for
> this functionality.
> 
> Chris
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org]
> Sent: Friday, April 03, 2015 9:34 AM
> To: Hannes Gredler; Pushpasis Sarkar; Chris Bowers; Chris Bowers; Pushpasis
> Sarkar; Hannes Gredler
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-bowers-spring-adv-per-
> algorithm-label-blocks-00.txt
> 
> 
> A new version of I-D, draft-bowers-spring-adv-per-algorithm-label-blocks-
> 00.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Chris Bowers and posted to the IETF
> repository.
> 
> Name:		draft-bowers-spring-adv-per-algorithm-label-blocks
> Revision:	00
> Title:		Advertising Per-Algorithm Label Blocks
> Document date:	2015-04-03
> Group:		Individual Submission
> Pages:		7
> URL:            http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-bowers-spring-adv-
> per-algorithm-label-blocks-00.txt
> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bowers-spring-adv-per-
> algorithm-label-blocks/
> Htmlized:       http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bowers-spring-adv-per-
> algorithm-label-blocks-00
> 
> 
> Abstract:
>    Segment routing uses globally-known labels to accomplish destination-
>    based forwarding along shortest paths computed using Dijkstra's
>    algorithm with IGP metrics.  This draft discusses how to use segment
>    routing to accomplish destination-based forwarding along paths
>    computed using other algorithms and metrics.  In particular, the
>    draft contrasts two different options for associating labels with
>    different algorithms for computing forwarding next-hops.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> The IETF Secretariat
> 
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.