Re: [Isis-wg] I-D Action:draft-ietf-isis-rfc2763bis-00.txt

This is part of the move things from informational to proposed  
standard. There should in fact be no substantive changes.

Chris.

On Oct 5, 2007, at 5:51 AM, Parker, Jeff wrote:

> I am sure that there is something new in the draft, but I have  
> missed it.
> How does this draft extend RFC 2763?  The TLV and encoding seem  
> unchanged.
>
> - jeff parker
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org [mailto:Internet-Drafts@ietf.org]
> Sent: Thu 10/4/2007 10:30 AM
> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
> Cc: isis-wg@ietf.org
> Subject: [Isis-wg] I-D Action:draft-ietf-isis-rfc2763bis-00.txt
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts  
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the IS-IS for IP Internets Working  
> Group of the IETF.
>
>
> 	Title           : Dynamic Hostname Exchange Mechanism for IS-IS
> 	Author(s)       : D. McPherson, N. Shen
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-isis-rfc2763bis-00.txt
> 	Pages           : 7
> 	Date            : 2007-09-30
>
> Currently, there does not exist a simple and dynamic mechanism for
> routers running IS-IS to learn about symbolic hostnames. This
> document defines a new TLV which allows the IS-IS routers to flood
> their name-to-systemID mapping information across the IS-IS network.
>
> The intention of this document is to provide an update to [RFC 2763].
>
> _______________________________________________
> Isis-wg mailing list
> Isis-wg@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg

_______________________________________________
Isis-wg mailing list
Isis-wg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg