[Isis-wg] Minor comments on draft-ietf-isis-wg-mib-13.txt
Jonathan Harrison <jon.harrison@dataconnection.com> Fri, 02 April 2004 21:48 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA03834 for <isis-wg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Apr 2004 16:48:37 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B9VKv-0005ze-L1 for isis-wg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 02 Apr 2004 15:32:21 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i32KWLGS023032 for isis-wg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 2 Apr 2004 15:32:21 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B9S5e-0006SQ-6l for isis-wg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 02 Apr 2004 12:04:22 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA18655 for <isis-wg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Apr 2004 12:04:19 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B9S5c-0005ju-00 for isis-wg-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 02 Apr 2004 12:04:20 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B9S4X-0005XF-00 for isis-wg-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 02 Apr 2004 12:03:14 -0500
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B9S3V-0005Jf-00 for isis-wg-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 02 Apr 2004 12:02:09 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B9Q7P-0004mM-OC; Fri, 02 Apr 2004 09:58:03 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B9LQq-0007VW-SL for isis-wg@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 02 Apr 2004 04:57:48 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA02082 for <isis-wg@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Apr 2004 04:57:46 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B9LQn-0004m2-00 for isis-wg@ietf.org; Fri, 02 Apr 2004 04:57:45 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B9LQ1-0004gL-00 for isis-wg@ietf.org; Fri, 02 Apr 2004 04:56:58 -0500
Received: from smtp.dataconnection.com ([192.91.191.4] helo=smtp.datcon.co.uk) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B9LPW-0004XJ-00 for isis-wg@ietf.org; Fri, 02 Apr 2004 04:56:26 -0500
Received: by goodman.datcon.co.uk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <2A747P5G>; Fri, 2 Apr 2004 10:55:52 +0100
Message-ID: <37701240971DD31193970000F6CCB9F7050420AF@duke.datcon.co.uk>
From: Jonathan Harrison <jon.harrison@dataconnection.com>
To: 'Jeff Parker' <jparker@axiowave.com>, isis-wg@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: [Isis-wg] Minor comments on draft-ietf-isis-wg-mib-13.txt
Sender: isis-wg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: isis-wg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/isis-wg/>
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 10:55:43 +0100
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60
Hi, We've got a number of minor suggested clarifications and typo fixes to the MIB, itemized below. Hopefully, these won't be too controversial! Please let me know what you think. Thanks, Jon ------------------------------------------- Jon Harrison Network Protocols Group Data Connection Ltd Tel: +44 20 8366 1177 Fax: +44 20 8363 1468 Email: jrh@dataconnection.com Web: http://www.dataconnection.com SUGGESTED FIXES =============== - The MIB defines the type WideMetric for 24 bit values and the type FullMetric for 32 bit values. The syntax for FullMetric should be "SYNTAX Unsigned32" rather than "SYNTAX Unsigned32 (0..16777215)". - The second sentence of the description of isisSysMaxAge should read "This should be at least 300 seconds greater than isisSysMaxLSPGenInt." - isisSysInstance and isisSysLevelIndex are used in notifications, and so the MIB compiler we use gives warnings because these objects have MAX-ACCESS not-accessible. Should these objects have MAX-ACCESS read-only (or accessible-for-notify) instead? - Both isisCircPassiveCircuit and isisCircLevelCSNPInterval have an empty REFERENCE "{}". The reference for isisCircPassiveCircuit should be removed. The reference for isisCircLevelCSNPInterval should be {ISIS.aoi completeSNPInterval (8)}. - isisISAdjIndex - the description should read "This value is automatically assigned by the system when the adjacency is created." - The references sometimes refer to level 1 objects, sometimes level 2 object (for example, l1DefaultMetric and l2DesignatedIntermediateSystem). It would be more consistent to just refer to L1 objects, if possible. - The description for isisISAdjAreaAddrIndex should read "This provides a simple way to walk the table." - The description of isisLSPSummaryEntry description has a typo - should be "Each entry describes an LSP currently stored in the system." - In the LSP table description change "tupples" to "tuples". - To make the capitalization consistent, the description of isisLSPTLVType should read "The type of this TLV". - The description of isisCircExtendedCircID could be clarified as follows "The value to be used as the extended circuit ID in 3Way handshake. This value is only used if isisCirc3WayEnabled is true, and must be unique across all circuits on this IS." - The description of the isisNotificationTable should read "Objects seen in the most recent notification from this instance of the IS-IS protocol." - isisPduOriginatingBufferSize - The description should read "Holds the size of isisSysOrigLSPBuffSize advertised by the peer in the originatingLSPBufferSize TLV." - To make it (even more!) obvious that the minimum LSP generation interval should be less than the maximum interval, modify the description of isisSysMaxLSPGenInt as follows "The value must be greater than any value configured for isisSysLevelMinLSPGenInt, and should be at least 300 seconds less than isisSysMaxAge." Similarly, add to the description of isisSysLevelMinLSPGenInt "The value must be less than isisSysMaxLSPGenInt." - isisSysTable description has a missing 's'. Should be "The set of instances of the Integrated IS-IS protocol existing on the system." - Add "This object follows the resettingTimer behavior." to the description of the isisCircLevelCSNPInterval. - For consistency, isisISAdjIPAddressType and isisISAdjIPAddress should be named isisISAdjIPAddrType and isisISAdjIPAddrAddress. - isisCircInitFails refers to "ISIS.aoi initialisationFailures", which counts specific adjacency initialization failures due to having no version or area address in common. The MIB should spell this out. For example, "The number of times initialization of an adjacency on this circuit has failed due to the peer having either no version or no area address in common with the local system." - Finally, isisCircLevelID. I'd like to clarify whether this object is only used for point to point circuits (as suggested by the reference to ptPtCircuitID), or whether this field can be given a sensible value for a LAN (since the CircuitID syntax doesn't give an option to return a zero length OCTET STRING). If the field does take a value on a LAN (with the disadvantage of making the meaning of the field less clear), then the following text could be used. "On a point to point circuit with a fully initialized adjacency to a peer IS, the value of this object is the circuit ID negotiated during adjacency initialization. In all other cases, the value is the concatenation of the local system ID and the one byte isisCircLevelIDOctet for this circuit. This is the value that would be proposed for the circuit ID on a point to point circuit, or for the LAN ID should this node be chosen as the LAN Designated IS." Or if the field is purely for use as the ptPtCircuitID, I suggest we change the Circuit ID syntax to "OCTET STRING (SIZE(0|7))", and change the description as follows: "On a point to point circuit with a fully initialized adjacency to a peer IS, the value of this object is the circuit ID negotiated during adjacency initialization. On a point to point circuit without such an adjacency, the value is the concatenation of the local system ID and the one byte isisCircLevelIDOctet for this circuit i.e. the value that would be proposed for the circuit ID. On other circuit types, the value returned is the zero length OCTET STRING." _______________________________________________ Isis-wg mailing list Isis-wg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg
- [Isis-wg] Minor comments on draft-ietf-isis-wg-mi… Jonathan Harrison
- RE: [Isis-wg] Minor comments on draft-ietf-isis-w… Don Goodspeed
- [Isis-wg] Minor comments on draft-ietf-isis-wg-mi… Jeff Parker
- [Isis-wg] Minor comments on draft-ietf-isis-wg-mi… Jeff Parker
- [Isis-wg] Minor comments on draft-ietf-isis-wg-mi… Jeff Parker
- RE: [Isis-wg] Minor comments on draft-ietf-isis-w… Jonathan Harrison
- RE: [Isis-wg] Minor comments on draft-ietf-isis-w… Jonathan Harrison