Re: [Isis-wg] I-D Action:draft-ietf-isis-layer2-11.txt

Peter Ashwood-Smith <Peter.AshwoodSmith@huawei.com> Mon, 28 February 2011 16:18 UTC

Return-Path: <Peter.AshwoodSmith@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: isis-wg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isis-wg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D809A3A69F9 for <isis-wg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:18:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.204
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.204 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.395, BAYES_00=-2.599, CN_BODY_35=0.339, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7f3XWnNlO9fH for <isis-wg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:18:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from usaga02-in.huawei.com (usaga02-in.huawei.com [206.16.17.70]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F93D3A693B for <isis-wg@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:18:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by usaga02-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LHC00KWK5CX0L@usaga02-in.huawei.com> for isis-wg@ietf.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:19:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from LapPSmith ([10.193.60.68]) by usaga02-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0LHC00KYN5CWAQ@usaga02-in.huawei.com> for isis-wg@ietf.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:19:44 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 11:19:43 -0500
From: Peter Ashwood-Smith <Peter.AshwoodSmith@huawei.com>
In-reply-to: <AANLkTim+Rk=r78-jnmiHvXKPfH7ton2OzKaQSS8JEC0e@mail.gmail.com>
To: 'Vishwas Manral' <vishwas@ipinfusion.com>, 'Xu Xiaohu' <xuxh@huawei.com>
Message-id: <006101cbd763$4f9c2b40$443cc10a@china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3664
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Content-type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Thread-index: AcvXXAKNphmW7pytQFi0mToCSBVDqAABd00A
Cc: isis-wg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] I-D Action:draft-ietf-isis-layer2-11.txt
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/isis-wg>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 16:18:46 -0000

Vishwas, couple of points below.

> In the way TRILL works (or SPB), they encapsulate the inner Ethernet
> packet and transport it across the domain. The domain itself uses just
> one VLAN (Designated VLAN) for forwarding, except at the edge.

SPB uses up to 16 backbone VLANs not just one. They are used to provide
diversity of routing and also tennant routing isolation in the core network.
I.e. tenant A and B do not share a given link or node. Infact more than 16
could be used where the first 16 belong to Multi Topology #1 and an
additional set belong to a different Multi Topology.

>To map services to SPB uses I-SID (which is different from the outer
>VLAN) - see 802.1ah. TRILL also has a plan to optionally add such a
>field in the packet. As this is end to end, it may not affect
>forwarding on the intermediate devices. If this has to be transported
>in the IS-IS, we may require a TLV you have mentioned.

It is only true that an ISID does not affect core devices if you do not wish
to scope multicast to just members of that ISID or if you wish not to do
multicast and instead do serial unicast. Usually however we want to scope
the multicast and wish to do tandem replication in which case the ISID has
to be considered in the construction of the state for tandem multicast.

Cheers,

Peter

2011/2/27 Xu Xiaohu <xuxh@huawei.com>:
> Hi all,
>
> As I heard from some could data center operators, 4096 VLANs would not be
> enough for isolating the huge amount of tenants in their future data
center
> networks. Besides, the VLAN translation is a desirable feature in some
> scenarios (e.g., the same VLAN ID in different parts of the data center
> network is used for different tenants while different VLAN IDs in
different
> parts of the data center network are used to connect a single tenant).
>
> Hence, I wonder whether it is possible to replace the fixed-length VLAN ID
> field (e.g., the VLAN-ID field in the MAC-reachability TLV as shown below)
> with a tenant/VPN instance ID TLV. With such TLV, at least the two
problems
> mentioned above can be solved easily.
>
> Best wishes,
> Xiaohu
>
> ========================================================================
> 2.1.  The MAC-Reachability TLV
>
>   The MAC-Reachability (MAC-RI) TLV is IS-IS TLV type 141 and has the
>   following format:
>
>   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>   | Type= MAC-RI  |                  (1 byte)
>   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>   |   Length      |                  (1 byte)
>   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>   |   Topology-Id/ Nickname       |  (2 bytes)
>   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>   |   Confidence  |                  (1 byte)
>   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>   |  RESV |      VLAN-ID          |  (2 bytes)
>   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>   |                          MAC (1)    (6 bytes)                 |
>   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>   |                   .................                           |
>   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>   |                          MAC (N)    (6 bytes)                 |
>   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>
>
>
>> -----邮件原件-----
>> 发件人: isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org] 代表
>> Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
>> 发送时间: 2011年2月10日 4:00
>> 收件人: i-d-announce@ietf.org
>> 抄送: isis-wg@ietf.org
>> 主题: [Isis-wg] I-D Action:draft-ietf-isis-layer2-11.txt
>>
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>> directories.
>> This draft is a work item of the IS-IS for IP Internets Working Group of
> the
>> IETF.
>>
>>
>>       Title           : Extensions to IS-IS for Layer-2 Systems
>>       Author(s)       : A. Banerjee, D. Ward
>>       Filename        : draft-ietf-isis-layer2-11.txt
>>       Pages           : 11
>>       Date            : 2011-02-09
>>
>> This document specifies the Intermediate System to Intermediate
>> System (IS-IS) extensions necessary to support link state routing for
>> any protocols running directly over Layer-2.  While supporting this
>> concept involves several pieces, this document only describes
>> extensions to IS-IS.  Furthermore, the Type, Length, Value pairs
>> (TLVs) described in this document are generic Layer-2 additions and
>> specific ones as needed are defined in the IS-IS technology specific
>> extensions.  We leave it to the systems using these IS-IS extensions
>> to explain how the information carried in IS-IS is used.
>>
>> A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-isis-layer2-11.txt
>>
>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>>
>> Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader
>> implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the
>> Internet-Draft.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Isis-wg mailing list
> Isis-wg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg
>
_______________________________________________
Isis-wg mailing list
Isis-wg@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg