IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Isis-wg] More support? Re: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-isis-sbfd-discriminator-02

"Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com> Thu, 01 October 2015 14:57 UTC

Return-Path: <ginsberg@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8791E1A87A1 for <isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 07:57:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Kl-dEENBiuxw for <isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 07:57:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E44B1A891F for <isis-wg@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 07:57:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3052; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1443711424; x=1444921024; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=KoqAS0SUGPhBrStJk0u4T3Y6eu58JMAWl8WMyohy0hs=; b=f0WLkJjYFXEmweyZ6I0dwCUJE4xKb++hjSN8V+Laiu4bjgMd1XgGl2SI A9c24it3LQgGR8lpyyTeq54hSXrgEIQUieDE3WnYDM77L18oHNIcReBbz 3W4puqSwmsyGlWXAURtguzZiabzLRP/yiTyhqnHOfEaqHz6sGl+EPiwgS Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AOAgAkSQ1W/5FdJa1egydUbgaDJbpCAQ2BcQqFeQIcgRc4FAEBAQEBAQGBCoQkAQEBBAEBARoGEToXBAIBCA4DBAEBAwIjAwICAiULFAEICAIEARIIiCYNtySUQwEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARMEgSKFUYR+hRQGgmOBQwWSRoMzAYUVh3mbVwEfAQFCghEdFoE+cYhygQYBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,618,1437436800"; d="scan'208";a="192529012"
Received: from rcdn-core-9.cisco.com ([173.37.93.145]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 01 Oct 2015 14:57:03 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com (xch-aln-001.cisco.com [173.36.7.11]) by rcdn-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t91Ev3q9023637 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 1 Oct 2015 14:57:03 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-001.cisco.com (173.36.7.11) by XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com (173.36.7.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 09:57:02 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-001.cisco.com ([173.36.7.11]) by XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com ([173.36.7.11]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.000; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 09:57:02 -0500
From: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>
To: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>, ISIS-WG <isis-wg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Isis-wg] More support? Re: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-isis-sbfd-discriminator-02
Thread-Index: AQHQ/DRkU8/CZEbj+0Otnu0Oul1qZ55WuO5w
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 14:57:02 +0000
Message-ID: <8df71da368534e33b1f9c82ee67ecf48@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com>
References: <104E712C-0351-4ABD-9D5E-7A6E5194E74E@chopps.org> <87oagikhhv.fsf@chopps.org>
In-Reply-To: <87oagikhhv.fsf@chopps.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [128.107.163.44]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/isis-wg/V-Km3uzRsy4h0xlSb-I-fys8OHg>
Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] More support? Re: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-isis-sbfd-discriminator-02
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/isis-wg/>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 14:57:09 -0000

FWIW...

I support this as co-author.

But, it also seems relevant to comment on what seems to be a "behavior change".

In the past, expressions of support were expected when asking if a document should be made a WG item. However, once that happened, when a last call was issued it was only expected that folks should express reservations if they had any. Expressions of support for last call were not expected because it was assumed that since the WG had already been actively working on the document since it became a WG item support was implicit.

Now however it seems that there is an expectation that despite all of the history of the document post WG acceptance folks are supposed to once again say "Yes I support this".
When did this behavior change and could the chairs and/or the ADs explain why the change was made?

Thanx.

   Les


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Isis-wg [mailto:isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Christian
> Hopps
> Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2015 3:31 AM
> To: ISIS-WG
> Cc: chopps@chopps.org
> Subject: [Isis-wg] More support? Re: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-isis-sbfd-
> discriminator-02
> 
> 
> Hi Folks,
> 
> far there's not been much public indication of support for this draft. It did
> clear WG last call and we can move it forward on the belief that everyone is
> quietly accepting it; however, I would prefer it if a few more people could be
> vocal in their support of the document.
> 
> Thanks,
> Chris.
> 
> Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org> writes:
> 
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> > We are starting a WG Last Call on the following draft.
> >
> > “Advertising S-BFD Discriminators in IS-IS”
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-sbfd-discriminator/
> >
> > The LC is set to expire 3 weeks from now (allowing for common vacation
> > time) on Friday, September 4th, 2015.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Chris & Hannes.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Isis-wg mailing list
> > Isis-wg@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Isis-wg mailing list
> Isis-wg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status