RE: [Isis-wg] ext-lsp-frags-02 draft: support for overload bit per level

Amir,

Thanks for the pointer.  After re-reading 1.3, it does seem to cover
this case.

Thanks,
Don

 --- On Wed 11/06, Amir Hermelin  wrote:
From: Amir Hermelin [mailto: amir@cwnt.com]
To: dgoodspe@excite.com, isis-wg@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 10:14:22 +0200
Subject: RE: [Isis-wg] ext-lsp-frags-02 draft: support for overload bit per level

> Don,
> this is a correct observation, and relates not only to the overload bit.
> Instead of going into details regarding levels in this and other sections,
> thus lengthening the document needlessly, we prefered to mention in section
> 1.3 that the operation mode is set on a per-level and area basis, hence
> inducing no changes to the normal protocol guidelines for levels.
> 
> --
> Amir Hermelin                    
> Charlotte's Web Networks Inc.     
> 
> 
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Don Goodspeed [mailto:dgoodspe@excite.com]
> >Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 5:12 AM
> >To: isis-wg@ietf.org
> >Subject: [Isis-wg] ext-lsp-frags-02 draft: support for 
> >overload bit per level
> >
> >
> >
> >All,
> >
> >In draft-ietf-isis-ext-lsp-frags-02, in section 3.1.4 "Overload
> Bit",
> >since the overload bit is set per-level, shouldn't this be mentioned
> >in this section?
> >
> >-don
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
> >The most personalized portal on the Web!
> >_______________________________________________
> >Isis-wg mailing list
> >Isis-wg@ietf.org
> >https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Isis-wg mailing list
> Isis-wg@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg
> 

_______________________________________________
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!
_______________________________________________
Isis-wg mailing list
Isis-wg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg