IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Isis-wg] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-isis-rfc4971bis

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Sat, 19 March 2016 21:48 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1D2012D5E7; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 14:48:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -12.822
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.822 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLACK=1.7, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GxSLOa4sg06e; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 14:48:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C780712D59F; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 14:48:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1216; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1458424110; x=1459633710; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=0u42q8/GLl/Ph+FhDxzqROZi1q3712L2h2SCamISQFs=; b=H2rFhR/BSmALguFzz6UJ6+tAh9HZBnBywSidysT4EK2ia8UwbppwQAF/ +EvPxK+g9JWDkx2Z+LrohwOtv4FfJzcmNcMJylLLwg6NtaTpu1uaRUCYa 90EiEiYQI7fKO2Zw48RJpOiR8G47Kd/0GxLBi0DXsPVmK8/HyC5wwWHxP g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0A2AgDgx+1W/4cNJK1egzRTcga6GAENgW8XCoVsAhyBCDgUAQEBAQEBAWQnhEIBAQQBAQEaBhE6CxACAQgaAiYCAgIlCxUQAgQBDQWIJw6wWo8jAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBEQR8iWaEOoMCglYBBJdXAYVwiBOPB48FAR4BAUKDZWqJZX4BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,362,1454976000"; d="scan'208";a="250635586"
Received: from alln-core-2.cisco.com ([173.36.13.135]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 19 Mar 2016 21:48:28 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (xch-rtp-013.cisco.com [64.101.220.153]) by alln-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u2JLmSZv032153 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sat, 19 Mar 2016 21:48:28 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (64.101.220.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 17:48:27 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 17:48:27 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: "chopps@chopps.org" <chopps@chopps.org>, "isis-wg@ietf.org" <isis-wg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Isis-wg] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-isis-rfc4971bis
Thread-Index: AQHRgglwnvnLQwBfDUetsVRnqNXOuJ9hXs6A
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 21:48:27 +0000
Message-ID: <D3134021.51E54%acee@cisco.com>
References: <87wpoyqrcz.fsf@tops.chopps.org>
In-Reply-To: <87wpoyqrcz.fsf@tops.chopps.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.196]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <4538F36E4E215D429CD7838928D38014@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/isis-wg/bqEqKAjXV4Pi9C2FZLifLRZyjkA>
Cc: "isis-chairs@ietf.org" <isis-chairs@ietf.org>, "isis-ads@ietf.org" <isis-ads@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-isis-rfc4971bis
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/isis-wg/>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 21:48:31 -0000

I support as a WG member. This draft clarifies that case where the IS-IS
router is not running IPv4 and has no IPv4 addresses assigned.

As a WG Last Call comment, I’d like to see the differences with RFC 4971
articulated in a section in the introduction.

Thanks,
Acee 

On 3/19/16, 2:01 PM, "Isis-wg on behalf of chopps@chopps.org"
<isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of chopps@chopps.org> wrote:

>Hi Folks,
>
>We are starting a WG Last Call on the following draft.
>
>"IS-IS Extensions for Advertising Router Info"
>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-rfc4971bis/
>
>The LC is set to expire ~3 weeks from now (immediately following IETF95)
>on Saturday, April 11, 2016.
>
>Thanks,
>Chris & Hannes.
>
>_______________________________________________
>Isis-wg mailing list
>Isis-wg@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email