[Isis-wg] doubt about authentication on IS-IS p-2-p link
shengcheng <shengc@huawei.com> Mon, 16 February 2004 11:11 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA11509 for <isis-wg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 06:11:41 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Asgee-0005Ze-Qy for isis-wg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 06:11:15 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1GBBCq0021422 for isis-wg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 06:11:12 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Asgee-0005ZR-N0 for isis-wg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 06:11:12 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA11455 for <isis-wg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 06:11:08 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Asgea-0003q6-00 for isis-wg-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 06:11:08 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Asgdf-0003lU-00 for isis-wg-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 06:10:11 -0500
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Asgck-0003hz-00 for isis-wg-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 06:09:14 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AsgcX-0005OV-Ey; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 06:09:01 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Asgbi-0005Hz-AI for isis-wg@optimus.ietf.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 06:08:10 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA11282 for <isis-wg@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 06:08:06 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Asgbe-0003cz-00 for isis-wg@ietf.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 06:08:06 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Asgaf-0003Zq-00 for isis-wg@ietf.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 06:07:06 -0500
Received: from mta1.huawei.com ([61.144.161.40] helo=huawei.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AsgZg-0003Ur-00 for isis-wg@ietf.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 06:06:05 -0500
Received: from r27907 (huawei.com [172.17.1.60]) by mta1.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.16 (built May 14 2003)) with ESMTPA id <0HT600I0CBQ3VP@mta1.huawei.com> for isis-wg@ietf.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 18:56:28 +0800 (CST)
From: shengcheng <shengc@huawei.com>
To: isis-wg@ietf.org
Message-id: <002101c3f47c$95a5d0e0$10336e0a@HUAWEI.COM>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_3qQaifxVjBVn7JOIp1MmPQ)"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
Subject: [Isis-wg] doubt about authentication on IS-IS p-2-p link
Sender: isis-wg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: isis-wg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/isis-wg/>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 19:04:00 +0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.60
Dear all:
It is known that only one kind of PDU hello type works as p-2-p link(broadcast has two, level-1 and level-2 respectively)
When i configure the authentication on one p-2-p link running IS-IS, the router(such as Cisco's) also give level-1 and
level-2 option to choose. I wonder what is the rule to decide which level password configured should the p-2-p link used.
Anyone can give some information about this part? Thanks in advance.
thanks@regards
Shiny